Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670113›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Population differentiated copy number variation between Eurasian wild boar and domesticated pig populations.

Jisung Jang, Bongsang Kim, So Yun Jhang, Byeongyong Ahn, Mingue Kang, Chankyu Park, Eun Seok Cho, Young-Sin Kim, Woncheoul Park, Heebal Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jisung JangInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Bongsang KimeGnome, Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
So Yun JhangInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byeongyong AhnDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul, 05029, Korea.
Mingue KangDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul, 05029, Korea.
Chankyu ParkDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul, 05029, Korea.
Eun Seok ChoSwine Science Division, Rural Development Administration, National Institute of Animal Science, Cheonan, South Korea.
Young-Sin KimSwine Science Division, Rural Development Administration, National Institute of Animal Science, Cheonan, South Korea.
Woncheoul ParkAnimal Genomics and Bioinformatics Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea.
Heebal KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. heebal@snu.ac.kr.
Konkuk University · KRSeoul National University · KRNational Institute of Animal Science · KRNational University College · PRRural Development Administration · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sus scrofa is a globally distributed livestock species that still maintains two different ways of life: wild and domesticated. Herein, we detected copy number variation (CNV) of 328 animals using short read alignment on Sscrofa11.1. We compared CNV among five groups of porcine populations: Asian domesticated (AD), European domesticated (ED), Asian wild (AW), European wild (EW), and Near Eastern wild (NEW). In total, 21,673 genes were identified on 154,872 copy number variation region (CNVR). Differences in gene copy numbers between populations were measured by considering the variance-based value [Formula: see text] and the one-way ANOVA test followed by Scheffe test. As a result, 111 genes were suggested as copy number variable genes. Abnormally gained copy number on EEA1 in all populations was suggested the presence of minor CNV in the reference genome assembly, Sscrofa11.1. Copy number variable genes were related to meat quality, immune response, and reproduction traits. Hierarchical clustering of all individuals and mean pairwise [Formula: see text] in breed level were visualized genetic relationship of 328 individuals and 56 populations separately. Our findings have shown how the complex history of pig evolution appears in genome-wide CNV of various populations with different regions and lifestyles.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenomeAnimalsGene DosagePhenotypeSus scrofaSwine

Identifiers

PMID36670113
PMCPMC9859782
OpenAlexW4317600965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.