Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36669970›Full record

ArticleVaccine2023

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in care home staff: A survey of Liverpool care homes.

John S P Tulloch, Karen Lawrenson, Adam L Gordon, Sam Ghebrehewet, Matthew Ashton, Steve Peddie, Paula Parvulescu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

John S P TullochInstitute of Infection, Veterinary, and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Karen LawrensonPublic Health Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool, UK.
Adam L GordonSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sam GhebrehewetPublic Health England North West, Cheshire & Merseyside Health Protection Team, Liverpool, UK.
Matthew AshtonPublic Health Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool, UK.
Steve PeddieAdult Social Care Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool, UK.
Paula ParvulescuPublic Health Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: paula.parvulescu@liverpool.gov.uk.
Liverpool City Council · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uptake of COVID-19 vaccine first doses in UK care homes has been higher among residents compared to staff. We aimed to identify causes of lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake amongst care home staff within Liverpool. An anonymised online survey was distributed to all care home managers, between the 21st and the 29th January 2021. 53 % of 87 care homes responded. The overall COVID-19 vaccination rate was 52.6 % (n = 1119). Reasons, identified by care home managers for staff being unvaccinated included: concerns about lack of vaccine research (37.0 %), staff being off-site during vaccination sessions (36.5 %), pregnancy and fertility concerns (5.6 %), and allergic reactions concerns (3.2 %). Care home managers wanted to tackle vaccine hesitancy through conversations with health professionals, and provision of evidence dispelling vaccine misinformation. Vaccine hesitancy and logistical issues were the main causes for reduced vaccine uptake among care home staff. The former could be addressed by targeted training, and public health communication campaigns to build confidence and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCOVID-19CommunicationCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleFertilityHumansPregnancyVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCare homesCOVID-19UKVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36669970
PMCPMC9826986
OpenAlexW4313825707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.