Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36669950›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2023

Clinical progress in genome-editing technology and in vivo delivery techniques.

Jennifer Khirallah, Maximilan Eimbinder, Yamin Li, Qiaobing Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in genome editing · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer KhirallahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Maximilan EimbinderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Yamin LiDepartment of Pharmacology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. Electronic address: Liyam@upstate.edu.
Qiaobing XuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA. Electronic address: Qiaobing.xu@tufts.edu.

Funding

Efficient in Vivo RNP-based Gene Editing in the Sensory Organ Inner Ear Using Bioreducible Lipid NanoparticlesUG3TR002636 · NCATS · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI CHEN, ZHENG-YI, LIU, DAVID R · 2018 to 2020
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UG3 TR002636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is wide interest in applying genome-editing tools to prevent, treat, and cure a variety of diseases. Since the discovery of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) systems, these techniques have been used in combination with different delivery systems to create highly efficacious treatment options. Each delivery system has its own advantages and disadvantages and is being used for various applications. With the large number of gene-editing applications being studied but very few being brought into the clinic, we review current progress in the field, specifically where genome editing has been applied in vivo and in the clinic, and identify current challenges and areas of future growth.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingTreatment Outcomeclinical trialsCRISPR/Cas9delivery systemsgenome editingin vivo

Identifiers

PMID36669950
PMCPMC9974761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.