Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36669886›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Nutrient-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning in Monkeys.

Fei-Yang Huang, Fabian Grabenhorst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rats pursue food and leisure following the same rational principles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The interoceptive origin of reinforcement learning.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Having multiple selves helps learning agents explore and adapt in complex changing worlds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fei-Yang HuangDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom.
Fabian GrabenhorstDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom fabian.grabenhorst@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6455-0648

Funding

Wellcome Trust 206207/Z/17/AWellcome Trust 206207/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In reinforcement learning (RL), animals choose by assigning values to options and learn by updating these values from reward outcomes. This framework has been instrumental in identifying fundamental learning variables and their neuronal implementations. However, canonical RL models do not explain how reward values are constructed from biologically critical intrinsic reward components, such as nutrients. From an ecological perspective, animals should adapt their foraging choices in dynamic environments to acquire nutrients that are essential for survival. Here, to advance the biological and ecological validity of RL models, we investigated how (male) monkeys adapt their choices to obtain preferred nutrient rewards under varying reward probabilities. We found that the nutrient composition of rewards strongly influenced learning and choices. Preferences of the animals for specific nutrients (sugar, fat) affected how they adapted to changing reward probabilities; the history of recent rewards influenced choices of the monkeys more strongly if these rewards contained the their preferred nutrients (nutrient-specific reward history). The monkeys also chose preferred nutrients even when they were associated with lower reward probability. A nutrient-sensitive RL model captured these processes; it updated the values of individual sugar and fat components of expected rewards based on experience and integrated them into subjective values that explained the choices of the monkeys. Nutrient-specific reward prediction errors guided this value-updating process. Our results identify nutrients as important reward components that guide learning and choice by influencing the subjective value of choice options. Extending RL models with nutrient-value functions may enhance their biological validity and uncover nutrient-specific learning and decision variables.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyRewardAnimalsChoice BehaviorHaplorhiniMaleNeuronsNutrientsNutrientsfoodlearningnutrientspreferencerewardreward prediction error

Identifiers

PMID36669886
PMCPMC10010454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.