SynthesisSexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives2023
Recommendations for improving maternal health services in Indonesian primary care under the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a systematic review and appraisal of international guidelines.
Synthesis in Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of guidelines on antimicrobials use in food-producing animals: a systematic review.One health outlook · 2025Review
- Impact of COVID-19 on essential service provision for reproductive, maternal, neonatal, and child health in the Southeast Asia region: a systematic review.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Article
- Adopting international recommendations to design a model for maternal health service to cope with pandemic disruption for Indonesian primary care.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA large volume of evidence and reviews about COVID-19 recommendations have been published; however, only a few provide recommendations on maternal health services ready for their adoption in Indonesia. This review aims to identify a set of potential recommendations for improving maternal care in the Indonesian primary care setting under the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsA literature search to identify articles that cover a set of recommendations, or maternal guideline under the SARS-COV-1 outbreak or COVID-19 pandemic that were published from 2020 to 1 November 2022 was applied in six academic databases. The search used various keywords and phrases of 'maternal', 'model' and 'coronavirus', and excluded reviews and those evaluating interventions or medicine prescription. The eligible guidelines were appraised using AGREE II instrument, coded, and thematically analysed for their potential adoption to Indonesian settings.
findingsFourteen guidelines were fully reviewed, and most of them had high AGREE II scores. Two main themes emerged from the analysis: clinical and supporting arrangements for maternal health services. Potential challenges for the implementation of these recommendations in Indonesia were also discussed. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Potential recommendations for improving maternal health for women in Indonesia under the COVID-19 pandemic both on the clinical and supporting services arrangements have been identified. Available clinical resources, different context of providers' practice authority and patients' literacy may challenge their implementation in practice. Further research is needed to seek consensus on the recommendation adoption in practice and to desirably redesign maternal health service in Indonesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.