Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36669039›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2023

Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance.

Behnam Asadi, Fahimeh Seyedasgari, Iradj Ashrafi Tamai, Mehdi Yarmohammadi, Reza Ebadi, Ellen Kim, Abbas Barin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Behnam AsadiCamel Advanced Reproductive Technologies Center, Zabeel Office, Government of Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 5928, United Arab Emirates.
Fahimeh SeyedasgariCamel Advanced Reproductive Technologies Center, Zabeel Office, Government of Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 5928, United Arab Emirates.
Iradj Ashrafi TamaiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran P.O. Box 1417935840, Iran.
Mehdi YarmohammadiCamel Advanced Reproductive Technologies Center, Zabeel Office, Government of Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 5928, United Arab Emirates.
Reza EbadiCamel Advanced Reproductive Technologies Center, Zabeel Office, Government of Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 5928, United Arab Emirates.
Ellen KimCamel Advanced Reproductive Technologies Center, Zabeel Office, Government of Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 5928, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-5825-6920
Abbas BarinDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran P.O. Box 1417935840, Iran.
Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government · AEUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p < 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring < 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p > 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p < 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria.

Indexed as

bacteriamicrobiotapregnancyuterine discharge

Identifiers

PMID36669039
PMCPMC9865171
OpenAlexW4313569229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.