ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography
Quantitative Study of Vertebral Body and Paravertebral Muscle Degeneration Based on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Correlation With Bone Mineral Density.
Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Correlation between paraspinal muscle fat infiltration and thoracic vertebral degeneration based on phantom-less QCT: a novel insight into thoracic vertebral degeneration.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Exploring the interplay between paraspinal muscular status and bone health in osteoporosis and fracture risk: a comprehensive literature review on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography to evaluate the effect of less paraspinal muscle damage on bone mineral density changes after lumbar interbody fusion.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to quantify the degeneration of the vertebral body and paravertebral muscles using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and study its relationship with osteoporosis.
methodsA total of 130 patients with chronic low back pain were included in this study, and DECT scanning of the lumbar region was undertaken prospectively. By placing a standard quantitative computed tomography corrected phantom under the waist during the DECT procedure, bone mineral density (BMD) and the following quantitative parameters were obtained: calcium density (CaD), vertebral fat fraction (VFF), psoas major area, psoas major fat fraction, erector spinalis area, and erector spinalis fat fraction (ESFF). Independent sample t test and 1-way analysis of variance were used between different age-BMD groups. Pearson test was applied to determine correlations for all measurements, and a mathematical model of BMD was established through regression analysis.
resultsCalcium density, VFF, psoas major area, psoas major fat fraction, erector spinalis area, and ESFF were significantly different among the age-BMD groups (P < 0.05), and BMD was significantly correlated with these parameters (P < 0.05). Calcium density, VFF, and ESFF were included in the BMD regression equation: BMD = 69.062 + 11.637 × CaD - 1.018 × VFF - 0.726 × ESFF (R2 = 0.860, F = 125.979, P < 0.001).
conclusionsDegeneration of the vertebral body and paravertebral muscles can be quantitatively analyzed using DECT, and CaD, VFF, and ESFF were independent influencing factors of BMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.