Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36668734›Full record

ArticleToxics2022

Discovering Novel Bioactivities of Controversial Food Additives by Means of Simple Zebrafish Embryotoxicity (ZET) Assays.

Dinh Duy-Thanh, Nguyen Bich-Ngoc, François Van den Bossche, Nguyen Lai-Thanh, Marc Muller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dinh Duy-ThanhLaboratory for Organogenesis and Regeneration, GIGA Institute, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4346-4150
Nguyen Bich-NgocLEMA, Urban and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
François Van den BosscheLaboratory for Organogenesis and Regeneration, GIGA Institute, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Nguyen Lai-ThanhDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-3930-2818
Marc MullerLaboratory for Organogenesis and Regeneration, GIGA Institute, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6030-2164

Funding

Wallonie-Bruxelles International CMP8.24 and CMP9.10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising concerns about controversial food additives' potential hazardous properties require extensive yet animal-minimized testing strategies. Zebrafish embryos are the ideal in vivo model representing both human and environmental health. In this study, we exposed zebrafish embryos to eight controversial food additives. Our results indicate that Sodium Benzoate is a Cat.3 aquatic toxicant, while Quinoline Yellow is a strong teratogen. At high concentrations, non-toxic chemicals induced similar phenotypes, suggesting the impact of ionic strength and the applicability of the darkened yolk phenotype as an indicator of nephrotoxicity. Three food additives showed unpredicted bioactivities on the zebrafish embryos: Brilliant Blue could weaken the embryonic yolk, Quinoline Yellow may interfere with nutrient metabolism, and Azorubine induced precocious zebrafish hatching. In conclusion, the zebrafish embryo is ideal for high throughput chemical safety and toxicity screening, allowing systematic detection of biological effects-especially those unexpected by targeted in vitro and in silico models. Additionally, our data suggest the need to reconsider the safety status of food additives Quinoline Yellow, Brilliant Blue, Sodium Benzoate, and other controversial food additives in further studies, as well as pave the way to further applications based on the newly found properties of Brilliant Blue and Azorubine.

Indexed as

bioactivitiesdevelopmental toxicologyembryosfood additivesfood safetyzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID36668734
PMCPMC9861749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.