Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36668687›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2023

Field testing of transgenic aspen from large greenhouse screening identifies unexpected winners.

Evgeniy N Donev, Marta Derba-Maceluch, Zakiya Yassin, Madhavi Latha Gandla, Sivan Pramod, Emilia Heinonen, Vikash Kumar, Gerhard Scheepers, Francisco Vilaplana, Ulf Johansson and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Evgeniy N DonevDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7279-0481
Marta Derba-MaceluchDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8034-3630
Zakiya YassinEnhet Produktionssystem och Material, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Växjö, Sweden.
Madhavi Latha GandlaDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2798-6298
Sivan PramodDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5297-2221
Emilia HeinonenDivision of Glycoscience, Department of Chemistry, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, AlbaNova University Centre, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5069-2370
Vikash KumarDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1670-3491
Gerhard ScheepersEnhet Produktionssystem och Material, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Växjö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5630-1377
Francisco VilaplanaDivision of Glycoscience, Department of Chemistry, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, AlbaNova University Centre, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3572-7798
Ulf JohanssonTönnersjöheden Experimental Forest, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Simlångsdalen, Sweden.
Magnus HertzbergSweTree Technologies AB, Umeå, Sweden.
Björn SundbergDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Sandra WinestrandDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8784-9696
Andreas HörnbergRISE Processum AB, Örnsköldsvik, Sweden.
Björn AlrikssonRISE Processum AB, Örnsköldsvik, Sweden.
Leif J JönssonDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3866-0111
Ewa J MellerowiczDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6817-1031
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUmeå University · SERISE Research Institutes of Sweden · SEWallenberg Wood Science Center · SESweTree Technologies (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trees constitute promising renewable feedstocks for biorefinery using biochemical conversion, but their recalcitrance restricts their attractiveness for the industry. To obtain trees with reduced recalcitrance, large-scale genetic engineering experiments were performed in hybrid aspen blindly targeting genes expressed during wood formation and 32 lines representing seven constructs were selected for characterization in the field. Here we report phenotypes of five-year old trees considering 49 traits related to growth and wood properties. The best performing construct considering growth and glucose yield in saccharification with acid pretreatment had suppressed expression of the gene encoding an uncharacterized 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase (2OGD). It showed minor changes in wood chemistry but increased nanoporosity and glucose conversion. Suppressed levels of SUCROSE SYNTHASE, (SuSy), CINNAMATE 4-HYDROXYLASE (C4H) and increased levels of GTPase activating protein for ADP-ribosylation factor ZAC led to significant growth reductions and anatomical abnormalities. However, C4H and SuSy constructs greatly improved glucose yields in saccharification without and with pretreatment, respectively. Traits associated with high glucose yields were different for saccharification with and without pretreatment. While carbohydrates, phenolics and tension wood contents positively impacted the yields without pretreatment and growth, lignin content and S/G ratio were negative factors, the yields with pretreatment positively correlated with S lignin and negatively with carbohydrate contents. The genotypes with high glucose yields had increased nanoporosity and mGlcA/Xyl ratio, and some had shorter polymers extractable with subcritical water compared to wild-type. The pilot-scale industrial-like pretreatment of best-performing 2OGD construct confirmed its superior sugar yields, supporting our strategy.

Indexed as

LigninPopulusGenetic EngineeringGlucoseWoodGlucoseLigninenzymatic saccharificationfield trialsecondary cell wallSilviScansubcritical water extractiontransgenic Populus

Identifiers

PMID36668687
PMCPMC10106850
OpenAlexW4317600264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.