ArticlePloS one2023
Temporal trends in, and associations of, early-career general practitioner prescriptions of second-line Type 2 Diabetes medications, 2010-2018.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variation in uptake of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analogues in adults with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSecond-line pharmacotherapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ('diabetes') is necessary for optimal glycaemic control and preventing longer-term complications. We aimed to describe temporal trends in, and associations of, Australian general practitioner (GP) registrars' prescription, and initiation, of 'new' second-line oral agents (dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists) compared to sulphonylureas. MATERIALS AND
methodsA longitudinal analysis (2010-2018) of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training project. Analysis included any diabetes problem/diagnosis that involved prescription of sulphonylureas or 'new' oral agents. Simple and multiple logistic regression models were fitted within the generalised estimating equations framework.
results2333 registrars recorded 6064 diabetes problems/diagnoses (1.4%). 835 problems/diagnoses involved sulphonylurea or 'new' medication prescription. Of these, 61.0% [95% CI:57.4-64.4] involved 'new' medication prescription. 230 problems/diagnoses involved sulphonylurea or 'new' medication initiation, with 77% [95%CI:70.8-82.1] involving a 'new' medication. There was a significant 52% per year increase in prescribing (OR = 1.52[95% CI:1.38-1.68],p<0.001), and a 77% per (two-to-three-year) time-interval increase in initiation (OR = 1.77,[95% CI:1.30-2.43],p = <0.001) of 'new' medications compared to sulphonylureas. 'New' medications were prescribed less for non-English-speaking patients. There was some regional variation in prescribing.
conclusionRegistrar uptake of 'new' oral agents compared to sulphonylureas has increased rapidly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.