Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662730›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Effects of sensorimotor voice training on event-related potentials to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.

Sona Patel, Karen Hebert, Oleg Korzyukov, Charles R Larson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DIVA Meets EEG: Model Validation Using Formant-Shift Reflex.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sona PatelDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-9528
Karen HebertDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, United States of America.
Oleg KorzyukovDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America.
Charles R LarsonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of South Dakota · US

Funding

Sensory Mechanisms of Voice ControlR01DC006243 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LARSON, CHARLES R · 2004 to 2013
$4.6M
Understanding the Voice Control System in Parkinson's DiseaseR03DC013883 · NIDCD · SETON HALL UNIVERSITY · PI PATEL, SONA · 2014 to 2016
$383k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006243NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pitch perturbation technique is a validated technique that has been used for over 30 years to understand how people control their voice. This technique involves altering a person's voice pitch in real-time while they produce a vowel (commonly, a prolonged /a/ sound). Although post-task changes in the voice have been observed in several studies (e.g., a change in mean fo across the duration of the experiment), the potential for using the pitch perturbation technique as a training tool for voice pitch regulation and/or modification has not been explored. The present study examined changes in event related potentials (ERPs) and voice pitch in three groups of subjects due to altered voice auditory feedback following a brief, four-day training period. Participants in the opposing group were trained to change their voice fo in the opposite direction of a pitch perturbation stimulus. Participants in the following group were trained to change their voice fo in the same direction as the pitch perturbation stimulus. Participants in the non-varying group did not voluntarily change their pitch, but instead were asked to hold their voice constant when they heard pitch perturbations. Results showed that all three types of training affected the ERPs and the voice pitch-shift response from pre-training to post-training (i.e., "hold your voice pitch steady" task; an indicator of voice pitch regulation). Across all training tasks, the N1 and P2 components of the ERPs occurred earlier, and the P2 component of the ERPs occurred with larger amplitude post-training. The voice responses also occurred earlier but with a smaller amplitude following training. These results demonstrate that participation in pitch-shifted auditory feedback tasks even for brief periods of time can modulate the automatic tendency to compensate for alterations in voice pitch feedback and has therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyVoiceEvoked PotentialsFeedbackFeedback, SensoryHumansPitch PerceptionVoice Training

Identifiers

PMID36662730
PMCPMC9858400
OpenAlexW4317553712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.