Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662520›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Transcriptomic Analyses of Pretreatment Tumor Biopsy Samples, Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, and Survival in Patients With Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Takashi Akiyoshi, Zhe Wang, Tomoko Kaneyasu, Osamu Gotoh, Norio Tanaka, Sayuri Amino, Noriko Yamamoto, Hiroshi Kawachi, Toshiki Mukai, Yukiharu Hiyoshi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Takashi AkiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Zhe WangProject for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoko KaneyasuProject for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu GotohProject for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio TanakaProject for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Sayuri AminoProject for Development of Genomics-Based Cancer Medicine, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko YamamotoDivision of Pathology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi KawachiDivision of Pathology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiki MukaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiharu HiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiya NagasakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsuyoshi KonishiDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Yosuke FukunagaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuo NodaCancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiichi MoriProject for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for advanced rectal cancer. Yet, estimating response to CRT remains an unmet clinical challenge. Objective: To investigate and better understand the transcriptomic factors associated with response to neoadjuvant CRT and survival in patients with advanced rectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-center, retrospective, case series was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. Pretreatment biopsies from 298 patients with rectal cancer who were later treated with neoadjuvant CRT between April 1, 2004, and September 30, 2020, were analyzed by RNA sequencing. Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2021, to May 31, 2022. Exposures: Chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision or watch-and-wait management. Main Outcomes and Measures: Transcriptional subtyping was performed by consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification. Immune cell infiltration was assessed using microenvironment cell populations-counter (MCP-counter) scores and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Patients with surgical specimens of tumor regression grade 3 to 4 or whose care was managed by the watch-and-wait approach for more than 3 years were defined as good responders. Results: Of the 298 patients in the study, 205 patients (68.8%) were men, and the median age was 61 (IQR, 52-67) years. Patients classified as CMS1 (6.4%) had a significantly higher rate of good response, albeit survival was comparable among the 4 subtypes. Good responders exhibited an enrichment in various immune-related pathways, as determined by ssGSEA. Microenvironment cell populations-counter scores for cytotoxic lymphocytes were significantly higher for good responders than nonresponders (median, 0.76 [IQR, 0.53-1.01] vs 0.58 [IQR, 0.43-0.83]; P < .001). Cytotoxic lymphocyte MCP-counter score was independently associated with response to CRT, as determined in the multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.82-7.97; P < .001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, including postoperative pathologic factors, revealed the cytotoxic lymphocyte MCP-counter score to be independently associated with recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.92; P = .03) and overall survival (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.83; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series of patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant CRT, the cytotoxic lymphocyte score in pretreatment biopsy samples, as computed by RNA sequencing, was associated with response to CRT and survival. This finding suggests that the cytotoxic lymphocyte score might serve as a biomarker in personalized multimodal rectal cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsRectal NeoplasmsBiopsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesTranscriptomeTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID36662520
PMCPMC9860531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.