Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662344›Full record

Trial reportJournal of patient-reported outcomes2023

Mepolizumab improvements in health-related quality of life and disease symptoms in a patient population with very severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: psychometric and efficacy analyses from the SYNAPSE study.

Wytske Fokkens, Andrew Trigg, Stella E Lee, Robert H Chan, Zuzana Diamant, Claire Hopkins, Peter Howarth, Valerie Lund, Bhabita Mayer, Ana R Sousa and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03085797 (A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group PhIII Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of 100 mg SC Mepolizumab as an Add on to Maintenance Treatment in Adults With Severe Bilateral Nasal Polyps - SYNAPSE), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03085797 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group PhIII Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of 100 mg SC Mepolizumab as an Add on to Maintenance Treatment in Adults With Severe Bilateral Nasal Polyps - SYNAPSE (StudY in NAsal Polyps Patients to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Mepolizumab)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2017 to 2019Enrolled414ConditionsNasal PolypsArmsMepolizumab, Placebo, Mometasone furoate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Real-world impact of mepolizumab on symptom control and health utility in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: the RINOSUR 2.0 multicenter cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Visual and bibliometric analysis of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Wytske FokkensDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew TriggPatient-Centred Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Stella E LeeDivision of Otolaryngology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert H ChanClinical Sciences, Respiratory, GSK, GSK House, Brentford, Middlesex, UK. robert.h.chan@gsk.com.
Zuzana DiamantDepartment of Microbiology Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Claire HopkinsENT Department, Guys and St Thomas's Hospital, King's College, London, UK.
Peter HowarthGlobal Medical Affairs, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Valerie LundRoyal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Bhabita MayerClinical Statistics, GSK, GSK House, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Ana R SousaClinical Sciences, Respiratory, GSK, GSK House, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Steve YanceyRespiratory Therapeutic Area Unit, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Maggie TabbererRespiratory Patient Centered Outcomes, Value Evidence and Outcomes GSK, GSK House, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
SYNAPSE study group
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NLAdelphi Group (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (Germany) · DEHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USRoyal London Hospital · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (e.g. the 22-item Sino-nasal Outcomes Test [SNOT-22]) in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have been defined, these definitions have not been extensively studied in patients with very severe CRSwNP, as defined by recurrent disease despite ≥ 1 previous surgery and a current need for further surgery. Therefore, the psychometric properties of the symptoms visual analogue scales (VAS) were evaluated, and meaningful within-patient change thresholds were calculated for VAS and SNOT-22.

methodsSYNAPSE (NCT03085797), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week trial, assessed the efficacy and safety of 4-weekly mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously added to standard of care in very severe CRSwNP. Enrolled patients (n = 407) completed symptom VAS (six items) daily and SNOT-22 every 4 weeks from baseline until Week 52. Blinded psychometric assessment of individual and composite VAS was performed post hoc, including anchor-based thresholds for meaningful within-patient changes for VAS and SNOT-22, supported by cumulative distribution function and probability density function plots. The effect of mepolizumab versus placebo for 52 weeks on VAS and SNOT-22 scores was then determined using these thresholds using unblinded data.

resultsInternal consistency was acceptable for VAS and SNOT-22 scores (Cronbach's α-coefficients ≥ 0.70). Test-retest reliability was demonstrated for all symptom VAS (Intra-Class Correlation coefficients > 0.75). Construct validity was acceptable between individual and composite VAS and SNOT-22 total score (r = 0.461-0.598) and between individual symptom VAS and corresponding SNOT-22 items (r = 0.560-0.780), based upon pre-specified ranges. Known-groups validity assessment demonstrated generally acceptable validity based on factors associated with respiratory health, with all VAS responsive to change. Mepolizumab treatment was associated with significantly increased odds of meeting or exceeding meaningful within-patient change thresholds, derived for this very severe cohort using six anchor groups for individual VAS (odds ratio [OR] 2.19-2.68) at Weeks 49-52, and SNOT-22 (OR 1.61-2.96) throughout the study.

conclusionsSymptoms VAS and SNOT-22 had acceptable psychometric properties for use in very severe CRSwNP. Mepolizumab provided meaningful within-patient improvements in symptom severity and health-related quality of life versus placebo, indicating mepolizumab provides substantial clinical benefits in very severe CRSwNP.

Indexed as

Nasal PolypsRhinitisSinusitisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChronic DiseaseHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedmepolizumabChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polypsEfficacyMepolizumabPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)PsychometricQuality of lifeSeveritySNOT-22VAS

Identifiers

PMID36662344
PMCPMC9859976
OpenAlexW4317567649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.