Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662333›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Perspectives of registered dietitians and factors associated with their personal accomplishment in the management of cancer cachexia.

Saori Koshimoto, Koji Amano, Naoharu Mori, Shunsuke Oyamada, Sayaka Arakawa, Hiroto Ishiki, Eriko Satomi, Tatsuya Morita, Takashi Takeuchi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Factors associated with multimodal care practices for cancer cachexia among registered dietitians.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Saori KoshimotoSchool of Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Koji AmanoDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. kojiamano4813@gmail.com.
Naoharu MoriDepartment of Palliative and Supportive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute City, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Shunsuke OyamadaDepartment of Biostatistics, JORTC Data Center, 2-54-6-302 Nishi-Nippori, Arakawa-Ku, Tokyo, 116-0013, Japan.
Sayaka ArakawaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hiroto IshikiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Eriko SatomiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Tatsuya MoritaPalliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, 3453 Mikatahara-Cho, Kita-Ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, 433-8558, Japan.
Takashi TakeuchiLiaison Psychiatry and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Aichi Medical University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPResearch Organization of Information and Systems · JPSeirei Mikatabara General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRegistered dietitians (RDs) have the potential in cancer cachexia management. We investigated RDs' knowledge on cancer cachexia and assessed the effects of factors on RDs' perception of playing an important role in cancer cachexia management.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a survey examining the perspectives of health care professionals on cancer cachexia management. We sent the questionnaire to 451 RDs. RDs were divided into two groups: RDs with and without the perception. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square test. To examine the effects of factors on the perception, estimated crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the logistic regression model were calculated.

resultsA total of 237 RDs were analyzed. Significant differences were observed in the number of cancer patients/month, the primary area of practice, the number of clinical guidelines used, the number of items used, the number of symptoms used, and training for cancer cachexia management (p values all < 0.05). After adjustments, the factors of cancer care experience ≥ 20 years (OR 8.32, 95% CI 1.22-56.70; p = 0.030), the number of patients/month ≥ 50 (OR 27.35, 95% CI 3.99-187.24; p = 0.001), using the clinical guidelines (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.29-5.61; p = 0.008), the number of items ≥ 5 (OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.47-8.40; p = 0.005), and receiving training (OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.77-8.67; p = 0.001) significantly associated with the perception.

conclusionSpecific knowledge and training as well as abundant experience were associated with the perception.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNutritionistsCachexiaHealth PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesBurnoutCancer cachexiaDietitianNationwide surveyPerspective

Identifiers

PMID36662333
PMCPMC9852801
OpenAlexW4317567524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.