Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662312›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2023

Localization patterns of speech and language errors during awake brain surgery: a systematic review.

Ellen Collée, Arnaud Vincent, Evy Visch-Brink, Elke De Witte, Clemens Dirven, Djaina Satoer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Rapid fMRI Paradigm for Localisation of the Language Network.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ellen ColléeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, NA2118, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. k.collee@erasmusmc.nl.
Arnaud VincentDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, NA2118, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Evy Visch-BrinkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, NA2118, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Elke De WitteDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, NA2118, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Clemens DirvenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, NA2118, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Djaina SatoerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, NA2118, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Awake craniotomy with direct electrical stimulation (DES) is the standard treatment for patients with eloquent area gliomas. DES detects speech and language errors, which indicate functional boundaries that must be maintained to preserve quality of life. During DES, traditional object naming or other linguistic tasks such as tasks from the Dutch Linguistic Intraoperative Protocol (DuLIP) can be used. It is not fully clear which speech and language errors occur in which brain locations. To provide an overview and to update DuLIP, a systematic review was conducted in which 102 studies were included, reporting on speech and language errors and the corresponding brain locations during awake craniotomy with DES in adult glioma patients up until 6 July 2020. The current findings provide a crude overview on language localization. Even though subcortical areas are in general less often investigated intraoperatively, still 40% out of all errors was reported at the subcortical level and almost 60% at the cortical level. Rudimentary localization patterns for different error types were observed and compared to the dual-stream model of language processing and the DuLIP model. While most patterns were similar compared to the models, additional locations were identified for articulation/motor speech, phonology, reading, and writing. Based on these patterns, we propose an updated DuLIP model. This model can be applied for a more adequate "location-to-function" language task selection to assess different linguistic functions during awake craniotomy, to possibly improve intraoperative language monitoring. This could result in a better postoperative language outcome in the future.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaAdultBrainBrain MappingCraniotomyElectric StimulationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingQuality of LifeSpeechWakefulnessAwake surgeryDirect electrical stimulationGliomaIntraoperative language testingLanguage localizationLanguage mapping

Identifiers

PMID36662312
PMCPMC9859901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.