SynthesisNeurosurgical review2023
Localization patterns of speech and language errors during awake brain surgery: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurological outcomes and survival in patients with intracranial lesions undergoing awake craniotomy: a descriptive retrospective single-center study.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Article
- Neuromodulation by electrical stimulation timing during picture naming task based on high gamma dynamics.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2026Article
- Awake Craniotomy in Patients With Language Deficits: A Retrospective Cohort Study in 48 Patients.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2026Article
- Computational Neuroanatomy of Language: A Compartmental Framework From Cranial Landmarks to Subcortical Networks.Cureus · 2026Article
- A Rapid fMRI Paradigm for Localisation of the Language Network.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Native Languages Mapped With Direct Electrical Stimulation During Awake Craniotomy.Cureus · 2026Review
- Separating the forest from the palm trees: Individual variation in a presurgical language mapping task.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- A probabilistic functional atlas based on extraoperative electrocortical stimulation mapping.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Transient selective aphasia in highly proficient bilinguals triggered by electrical stimulation of the left superior temporal gyrus.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Review
- Awake craniotomy with English and British sign language mapping in a patient with a left temporal glioblastoma reveals discordant speech-sign language maps.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Performance of intraoperative neurocognitive tests during awake surgery for patients with diffuse low-grade glioma.Neurosurgical review · 2024Observational
- Embracing digital innovation in neuroscience: 2023 in review at NEUROCCINO.Brain structure & function · 2024Review
- Awake brain surgery: toward optimal cognitive explorations.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Awake craniotomy with direct electrical stimulation (DES) is the standard treatment for patients with eloquent area gliomas. DES detects speech and language errors, which indicate functional boundaries that must be maintained to preserve quality of life. During DES, traditional object naming or other linguistic tasks such as tasks from the Dutch Linguistic Intraoperative Protocol (DuLIP) can be used. It is not fully clear which speech and language errors occur in which brain locations. To provide an overview and to update DuLIP, a systematic review was conducted in which 102 studies were included, reporting on speech and language errors and the corresponding brain locations during awake craniotomy with DES in adult glioma patients up until 6 July 2020. The current findings provide a crude overview on language localization. Even though subcortical areas are in general less often investigated intraoperatively, still 40% out of all errors was reported at the subcortical level and almost 60% at the cortical level. Rudimentary localization patterns for different error types were observed and compared to the dual-stream model of language processing and the DuLIP model. While most patterns were similar compared to the models, additional locations were identified for articulation/motor speech, phonology, reading, and writing. Based on these patterns, we propose an updated DuLIP model. This model can be applied for a more adequate "location-to-function" language task selection to assess different linguistic functions during awake craniotomy, to possibly improve intraoperative language monitoring. This could result in a better postoperative language outcome in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.