Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662271›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023

Effects of mesenchymal stem cells and heparan sulfate mimetics on urethral function and vaginal wall biomechanics in a simulated rat childbirth injury model.

Kristine Janssen, Geertruida W van Ruiten, Niels Eijkelkamp, Margot S Damaser, Carl H van der Vaart

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristine JanssenDivision Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands. kristine.janssen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4398-3057
Geertruida W van RuitenDivision Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Niels EijkelkampCenter of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Margot S DamaserAdvanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Carl H van der VaartDivision Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Heidelberg University · DECleveland Clinic · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisNew treatments are needed for pelvic floor disorders. ReGeneraTing Agent® (RGTA®) is a promising regenerative therapy. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare regenerative abilities of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and RGTA® on regeneration after simulated childbirth injury in rats.

methodsRats underwent pudendal nerve crush and vaginal distension (PNC+VD) or sham injury. Rats that underwent PNC+VD were treated intravenously with vehicle, MSCs or RGTA® 1 h, 7 days, and 14 days after surgery. Sham rats received 1 ml vehicle at all time points. After 21 days, urethral function and pudendal nerve function were tested. Vaginal tissues were harvested for biomechanical testing and histology. Biaxial testing was performed to measure tissue stiffness.

resultsPNC+VD decreased urethral and pudendal nerve function compared with sham. Vaginal wall stiffness was significantly decreased in longitudinal and transverse tissue axes after PNC+VD compared with sham. MSC or RGTA® did not restore urethral or pudendal nerve function. However, MSC treatment resolved loss in vaginal wall stiffness in both tissue axes and improved collagen content within the vaginal wall. RGTA® treatment increased vaginal wall anisotropy by increasing relative stiffness in the longitudinal direction. PNC+VD (with vehicle or MSCs) enhanced elastogenesis, which was not observed after RGTA® treatment.

conclusionsTreatment with MSCs facilitated recovery of vaginal wall biomechanical properties and connective tissue composition after PNC+VD, whereas treatment with RGTA® resulted in anisotropic biomechanical changes. This indicates that MSCs and RGTA® promote different aspects of vaginal tissue regeneration after simulated childbirth injury.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsUrinary Incontinence, StressAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDisease Models, AnimalFemalePregnancyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVaginaAnimal modelBiomechanical propertiesMSCsRGTA®SUI

Identifiers

PMID36662271
PMCPMC10287815
OpenAlexW4317567685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.