Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662235›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Real-time corneal thickness changes during phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Jia Hu, Can Zhao, Yan Luo, Jun Kong, Weiyun Shi, Ting Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jia Hu *Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, China.
Can Zhao *Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Yan LuoEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Jun KongEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Weiyun ShiEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Ting WangEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China. wt-ting@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-4395

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82201154Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271052Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China U20A20386Young Taishan Scholar Program tsqn201909188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo observe the changes in corneal thickness during phacoemulsification cataract surgery and to analyze the influencing factors.

methodsOne hundred two patients (102 eyes) with cataracts undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery at Shandong Eye Hospital between July and October 2021 were included. Intraoperative OCT was applied to capture real-time images preoperatively, before and after ultrasonic emulsification, at the end of irrigation aspiration and the end of surgery. Then, the corneal thickness at the above time points was measured using Photoshop software.

resultsThe corneal thickness of 102 cataract patients was 511.79 ± 31.46 μm before operation and 512.71 ± 31.51 μm at the beginning of phacoemulsification, which increased by 0.91 ± 1.48 μm (0.2%). At the end of ultrasonic emulsification, the corneal thickness was 521.58 ± 32.75 μm and 8.87 ± 8.71 μm (1.7%) thicker than that before the procedure. After irrigation aspiration, the corneal thickness reached 528.09 ± 33.87 μm, which increased by 6.52 ± 6.38 μm (1.3%) compared with that of the previous step. At the end of the operation, the corneal thickness was 539.19 ± 33.88 μm, 11.09 ± 10.92 μm, and 27.37 ± 13.64 μm thicker than that of the previous step and the preoperative thickness, respectively, with an overall increase of 5.3%. The differences were statistically significant at all time points (all P < 0.001). Correlation analysis showed that postoperative corneal thickness changes were correlated with age, cataract lens nuclear grade, actual phacoemulsification time (APT), effective phacoemulsification time (EPT), average phacoemulsification energy (APE), total surgery time (TST), cell density (CD), maximum cell area (MAX), and cell area standard deviation (SD) (all P < 0.05), while the changes in thickness were not correlated with gender, cell area coefficient of variation (CV), percentage of hexagonal cells (6A), average cell area (AVE), or minimum cell area (MIN) (all P > 0.05).

conclusionsDuring phacoemulsification cataract surgery, corneal thickness gradually increases in real time with the increase of perfusion pressure and intraocular manipulation time. The real-time magnitude of intraoperative corneal thickness change is closely related to lens nucleus hardness, corneal endothelial cell density, ultrasound energy, and time for emulsification.

Indexed as

CataractPhacoemulsificationEndothelium, CornealHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularLens Nucleus, CrystallineVisual AcuityCorneal edema,·Intraoperative optical coherence tomographyCorneal thicknessPhacoemulsification cataract surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.