Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662145›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2023

A Positive Association between Working Memory Capacity and Human Creativity: A Meta-Analytic Evidence.

Zheng Gong, Kuan Miao, Xuerong Liu, Mengjie Luo, Yang Yu, Zhiyi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zheng GongSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Kuan MiaoSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Xuerong LiuSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Mengjie LuoExperimental Research Center for Medical and Psychological Science (ERC-MPS), Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Yang YuExperimental Research Center for Medical and Psychological Science (ERC-MPS), Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Zhiyi ChenSchool of Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1744-4647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creativity serves as a fountain for social and scientific development. As one of the most crucial human capabilities, creativity has been believed to be supported by the core component of higher cognitive functions—working memory capacity (WMC). However, the evidence supporting the association between WMC and creativity remains contradictory. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis using random-effects models to investigate the linear association between WMC and creativity by pooling the individual effect size from the previous literature. Further, a subgroup analysis was performed to examine whether such association is specific for different WMC categories (i.e., verbal WMC, visual−spatial WMC and dual-task WMC). The main meta-analytic results showed a significantly positive association between WMC and creativity (r = .083, 95% CI: .050−.115, p < .001, n = 3104, k = 28). The subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent results by showing a significantly positive association between them, irrespective of WMC category. We also found that cultural environments could moderate this association, and we identified a strong correlation in participants from an Asian cultural context. In conclusion, this study provides the evidence to clarify the positive association between WMC and creativity, and implies that the Asian cultural context may boost such an association.

Indexed as

creativitycultural environmentmeta-analysisworking memoryworking memory capacity

Identifiers

PMID36662145
PMCPMC9861316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.