Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662102›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2022

Medical Augmented Reality: Definition, Principle Components, Domain Modeling, and Design-Development-Validation Process.

Nassir Navab, Alejandro Martin-Gomez, Matthias Seibold, Michael Sommersperger, Tianyu Song, Alexander Winkler, Kevin Yu, Ulrich Eck

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05985746 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Augmented Reality in Anatomy Education: The TEACHANATOMY Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBalgrist University HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled48ConditionsAugmented Reality, Anatomy EducationArmsAugmented reality group, Traditional learning group
NCT06552195 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Hologram-Based Augmented Reality in Learning Anatomy: The TEACHANATOMY Randomized Cross-over Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBalgrist University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsAugmented Reality, Anatomy EducationArmslearning with augmented reality, learning with traditional methods
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Augmented reality navigation systems in endoscopy.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Augmented Reality in Breast Surgery Education.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nassir NavabComputer Aided Medical Procedures & Augmented Reality, Technical University Munich, DE-85748 Garching, Germany.
Alejandro Martin-GomezComputer Aided Medical Procedures & Augmented Reality, Technical University Munich, DE-85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9341-3477
Matthias SeiboldComputer Aided Medical Procedures & Augmented Reality, Technical University Munich, DE-85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9960-3244
Michael SommerspergerComputer Aided Medical Procedures & Augmented Reality, Technical University Munich, DE-85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6247-5306
Tianyu SongComputer Aided Medical Procedures & Augmented Reality, Technical University Munich, DE-85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8428-9651
Alexander WinklerComputer Aided Medical Procedures & Augmented Reality, Technical University Munich, DE-85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4896-7918
Kevin YuComputer Aided Medical Procedures & Augmented Reality, Technical University Munich, DE-85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4856-1806
Ulrich EckComputer Aided Medical Procedures & Augmented Reality, Technical University Munich, DE-85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5322-4724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three decades after the first set of work on Medical Augmented Reality (MAR) was presented to the international community, and ten years after the deployment of the first MAR solutions into operating rooms, its exact definition, basic components, systematic design, and validation still lack a detailed discussion. This paper defines the basic components of any Augmented Reality (AR) solution and extends them to exemplary Medical Augmented Reality Systems (MARS). We use some of the original MARS applications developed at the Chair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and deployed into medical schools for teaching anatomy and into operating rooms for telemedicine and surgical guidance throughout the last decades to identify the corresponding basic components. In this regard, the paper is not discussing all past or existing solutions but only aims at defining the principle components and discussing the particular domain modeling for MAR and its design-development-validation process, and providing exemplary cases through the past in-house developments of such solutions.

Indexed as

acoustic sensingArtificial IntelligenceAugmented Realitycomputer visionMedical Augmented Realitymulti-modal sensingperceptual visualizationsonificationsurgical data sciencevalidation

Identifiers

PMID36662102
PMCPMC9866223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.