Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662101›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2022

Auguring Fake Face Images Using Dual Input Convolution Neural Network.

Mohan Bhandari, Arjun Neupane, Saurav Mallik, Loveleen Gaur, Hong Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohan BhandariDepartment of Science and Technology, Samriddhi College, Lokanthali, Bhaktapur 44800, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-3163
Arjun NeupaneSchool of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Norman Gardens, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1010-7552
Saurav MallikDepartment of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4107-6784
Loveleen GaurAmity International Business School, Amity University, Noida 201303, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0885-1550
Hong QinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-6722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deepfake technology uses auto-encoders and generative adversarial networks to replace or artificially construct fine-tuned faces, emotions, and sounds. Although there have been significant advancements in the identification of particular fake images, a reliable counterfeit face detector is still lacking, making it difficult to identify fake photos in situations with further compression, blurring, scaling, etc. Deep learning models resolve the research gap to correctly recognize phony images, whose objectionable content might encourage fraudulent activity and cause major problems. To reduce the gap and enlarge the fields of view of the network, we propose a dual input convolutional neural network (DICNN) model with ten-fold cross validation with an average training accuracy of 99.36 ± 0.62, a test accuracy of 99.08 ± 0.64, and a validation accuracy of 99.30 ± 0.94. Additionally, we used 'SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) ' as explainable AI (XAI) Shapely values to explain the results and interoperability visually by imposing the model into SHAP. The proposed model holds significant importance for being accepted by forensics and security experts because of its distinctive features and considerably higher accuracy than state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)deepfakesface detectionSHAPXAI

Identifiers

PMID36662101
PMCPMC9861767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.