Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662088›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2023

Combining IVUS + OCT Data, Biomechanical Models and Machine Learning Method for Accurate Coronary Plaque Morphology Quantification and Cap Thickness and Stress/Strain Index Predictions.

Rui Lv, Liang Wang, Akiko Maehara, Mitsuaki Matsumura, Xiaoya Guo, Habib Samady, Don P Giddens, Jie Zheng, Gary S Mintz, Dalin Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Rui LvSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Liang WangSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Akiko MaeharaThe Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Columbia University, New York, NY 10019, USA.
Mitsuaki MatsumuraThe Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Columbia University, New York, NY 10019, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2082-0247
Xiaoya GuoSchool of Science, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.
Habib SamadyDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Don P GiddensDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Jie ZhengMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Gary S MintzThe Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Columbia University, New York, NY 10019, USA.
Dalin TangSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation · USSoutheast University · CNEmory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USMallinckrodt (United States) · USNanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications · CNWorcester Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universi-ties and Zhishan Young Scholars Fund administrated by Southeast University 2242021R41123Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Agency BE2016785National Sciences Foundation of China grants 11802060National Sciences Foundation of China grants 11972117Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20180352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment and prediction of vulnerable plaque progression and rupture risk are of utmost importance for diagnosis, management and treatment of cardiovascular diseases and possible prevention of acute cardiovascular events such as heart attack and stroke. However, accurate assessment of plaque vulnerability assessment and prediction of its future changes require accurate plaque cap thickness, tissue component and structure quantifications and mechanical stress/strain calculations. Multi-modality intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and angiography image data with follow-up were acquired from ten patients to obtain accurate and reliable plaque morphology for model construction. Three-dimensional thin-slice finite element models were constructed for 228 matched IVUS + OCT slices to obtain plaque stress/strain data for analysis. Quantitative plaque cap thickness and stress/strain indices were introduced as substitute quantitative plaque vulnerability indices (PVIs) and a machine learning method (random forest) was employed to predict PVI changes with actual patient IVUS + OCT follow-up data as the gold standard. Our prediction results showed that optimal prediction accuracies for changes in cap-PVI (C-PVI), mean cap stress PVI (meanS-PVI) and mean cap strain PVI (meanSn-PVI) were 90.3% (AUC = 0.877), 85.6% (AUC = 0.867) and 83.3% (AUC = 0.809), respectively. The improvements in prediction accuracy by the best combination predictor over the best single predictor were 6.6% for C-PVI, 10.0% for mean S-PVI and 8.0% for mean Sn-PVI. Our results demonstrated the potential using multi-modality IVUS + OCT image to accurately and efficiently predict plaque cap thickness and stress/strain index changes. Combining mechanical and morphological predictors may lead to better prediction accuracies.

Indexed as

coronary vulnerable plaquefibrous cap thicknessplaque modelsplaque vulnerability predictionvulnerable plaque model

Identifiers

PMID36662088
PMCPMC9864708
OpenAlexW4315628411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.