Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36662056›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2022

Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of Premixed Calcium Silicate and Resin Sealers.

Naji Kharouf, Salvatore Sauro, Ammar Eid, Jihed Zghal, Hamdi Jmal, Anta Seck, Valentina Macaluso, Frédéric Addiego, Francesco Inchingolo, Christine Affolter-Zbaraszczuk and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A comparative analysis of adhesion abilities between AH PlusJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Naji KharoufDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6768-138X
Salvatore SauroDental Biomaterials and Minimally Invasive Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, Cardenal Herrera-CEU University, CEU Universities, C/Santiago Ramón y Cajal, s/n., Alfara del Patriarca, 46115 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2527-8776
Ammar EidDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus 0100, Syria.
Jihed ZghalLaboratoire Energetique Mecanique Electromagnetisme, University of Paris Ouest, 50 Rue de Sèvres, 92410 Ville d'Avray, France.
Hamdi JmalICube Laboratory, Mechanics Department, UMR 7357 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6480-1139
Anta SeckDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Department of Odontostomatology, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odontology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar 10700, Senegal.
Valentina MacalusoESTA, School of Business and Technology, 90000 Belfort, France.
Frédéric AddiegoLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Department Materials Research and Technology (MRT), ZAE Robert Steichen, 5 Rue Bommel, L-4940 Hautcharage, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-4081-9526
Francesco InchingoloDepartment Interdisciplinary of Bari, Università di Bari "Aldo Moro", Giulio Cesare Square, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-5883
Christine Affolter-ZbaraszczukDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Florent MeyerDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5275-3421
Youssef HaikelDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Davide MancinoDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7376-371X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate specific mechanical and physicochemical properties of two calcium silicate based sealers, (AH Plus Bioceramic “AHPB”; Well-Root ST “WRST”), and a conventional resin sealer (AH Plus “AHP”). These aims were accomplished by assessing the porosity, pH, compression strength, roughness, wettability and cell attachment of the tested materials. The results were compared statistically using the one-way ANOVA test. Higher pH values were obtained in both AHPB and WRST compared to AHP at 3, 24 and 72 h (p < 0.05). A greater level of porosity and wettability was detected for both AHPB and WRST compared to the resin sealer AHP (p < 0.05). Evident cell growth characterized by elongated morphology was observed on the surface of AHPB and WRST, while only a thin layer of cells was seen on the surface of AHP. A significant lower compression strength and modulus were obtained in the specimens created using AHPB compared to those made with AHP and WRST (p < 0.05). The removal of calcium silicates may be quite tricky during endodontic retreatment. In conclusion, considering the limitations of the present in vitro study, both calcium silicate sealers demonstrated good physicochemical properties. However, the lower compression strength and modulus of AHPB may facilitate its removal and make the retreatment procedures considerably easier.

Indexed as

calcium silicate based sealermechanical propertiesporosityresin sealer

Identifiers

PMID36662056
PMCPMC9866383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.