Impact of Post-Harvest Management Practices in Corn (

Alan W Leslie, Scott R McCluen, Cerruti R R Hooks

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alan W LeslieUniversity of Maryland Extension, University of Maryland, Charles County, Bel Alton, MD 20611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-9699

Scott R McCluenDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

Cerruti R R HooksDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

University of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Maryland Extension · US

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 8080-21000-032-032-SMaryland Soybean Board N/AUnited States Department of Agriculture 2021-70006-35384

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increased adoption of cover cropping and conservation tillage in the USA. Many farmers view these practices as methods for improving their soils. However, different cover cropping and tillage practices conducted post-harvest can have a disparate impact on arthropods within the subsequent cash crop. Field experiments were conducted during 2017 and 2018 at two experimental sites to examine the influences of different post-harvest practices following corn (

Indexed as

herbivorenatural enemiesparasitismpredationstink bugtillage

Identifiers

PMID36662021

DOI10.3390/insects14010093

PMCPMC9861304

OpenAlexW4316469758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.