Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36661728›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Hemoglobin and Neutrophil Count as Prognostic Factors in Cholangiocarcinoma Patients in 2nd Line Treatment Setting: Results from a Small Monocentric Retrospective Study.

Carolina Liguori, Cecilia Copparoni, Cristiano Felicetti, Federica Pecci, Alessio Lupi, Giada Pinterpe, Rossana Berardi, Riccardo Giampieri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A comprehensive analysis of the association between anemia and systemic inflammation in older patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolina LiguoriClinica Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2874-6029
Cecilia CopparoniClinica Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Cristiano FelicettiClinica Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Federica PecciClinica Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Alessio LupiClinica Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-4233
Giada PinterpeClinica Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9395-2104
Rossana BerardiClinica Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Riccardo GiampieriClinica Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma prognosis can be extremely variable due to different symptoms and sites of disease involvement at diagnosis and unpredictable chemotherapy response rates. Most patients will usually receive 1st line palliative chemotherapy with platinum compounds and Gemcitabine or Gemcitabine alone. Only a few patients maintain adequate performance status after first-line treatment failure: second-line treatment with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI chemotherapy has been used in this setting with modest overall survival improvement. There is a lack of data concerning whether laboratory findings might help clinicians in identifying those patients with the highest likelihood of benefiting from 2nd line treatment. The aim of this analysis is to assess the prognostic role of a series of easily available laboratory tests in patients with bile duct cancer who received 2nd line chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with unresectable bile duct cancer treated in 2nd-line setting with platinum-based chemotherapy doublet or FOLFIRI were enrolled. The primary objective of the analysis was to assess overall survival (OS) differences among patients based on the results of lab tests. Serum hemoglobin, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, platelet absolute count, creatinine, total bilirubin, albumin, LDH, circulating CEA and CA19.9 values were collected at the start of 2nd line treatment. Cut-off values for all lab tests were set by ROC curve analysis. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan−Meier method and differences in survival among stratification factors were assessed by Log-rank test. Cox-proportional-hazard regression was used for multivariate analysis. Level of statistical significance p was set at 0.05 for all tests. Correction for false discovery error rate was performed by Holm’s stepdown procedure. Results: A total of 46 patients were eligible. Median overall survival of the entire cohort was 8.98 months (95%CI: 6.68−13.93) while mean OS was 17.10 months (standard error: 3.16). Using 6.2 months OS landmark as classification variable for ROC curve analysis, only serum hemoglobin (cut-off: >10 g/dL), albumin (cut-off: >3.5 mg/dL), CA19.9 (cut-off: ≤668 UI/mL), monocyte (cut-off: ≤510/mmc) and neutrophil count (cut-off: ≤5140/mmc) were significantly associated with the chosen end-point. Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent statistically significant impact on overall survival only for hemoglobin (Exp(b): 0.12, p = 0.0023) and neutrophil count (Exp(b): 0.30, p = 0.0039). Based on these results, using both hemoglobin and neutrophil count, three prognostic groups were defined: patients with both favorable factors had 12.63 months median OS vs. 6.75 months of patients with only one favorable factor vs. 1.31 months of those with neither. The difference between these three groups of patients was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Discussion: Second-line palliative chemotherapy can be a potentially useful option for a few patients with unresectable/metastatic bile duct cancer. Even though assessment of patients’ prognosis might be difficult due to the complex behavior of this disease, a series of easily available laboratory tests might be used for these means: serum hemoglobin and neutrophil count we0re able to define subsets of patients with entirely different prognoses. It is hoped that this score will be prospectively validated in a larger group of patients in order to improve treatment decisions in patients with unresectable bile duct cancer candidate to receive palliative 2nd line chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaAlbuminsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHemoglobinsHumansNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAlbuminsHemoglobins2nd line chemotherapycholangiocarcinomahemoglobinneutrophil countprognostic

Identifiers

PMID36661728
PMCPMC9857714
OpenAlexW4315646652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.