Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36661716›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Extended Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer in the Neoadjuvant Era: Current Status, Clinical Implications and Contentious Issues.

Luigi Marano, Ludovico Carbone, Gianmario Edoardo Poto, Valeria Restaino, Stefania Angela Piccioni, Luigi Verre, Franco Roviello, Daniele Marrelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Textbook outcome in gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter cohort study and proposal for a new specific index (TOGS).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luigi MaranoUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-9588
Ludovico CarboneUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2862-6788
Gianmario Edoardo PotoUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Valeria RestainoUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3081-1715
Stefania Angela PiccioniUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Luigi VerreUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1010-7296
Franco RovielloUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4122-1259
Daniele MarrelliUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2066-1618
University of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its decreasing incidence, gastric cancer remains an important global healthcare problem due to its overall high prevalence and high mortality rate. Since the MAGIC and FNLCC/FFCD trials, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been recommended throughout Europe in gastric cancer. Potential benefits of preoperative treatments include a higher rate of R0 resection achieved by downstaging the primary tumor, a likely effect on micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in the lymph nodes, and, as a result, improved cancer-related survival. Nevertheless, distortion of anatomical planes of dissection, interstitial fibrosis, and sclerotic tissue changes may increase surgical difficulty. The collection of at least twenty-five lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy would seem to ensure removal of undetectable node metastasis and reduce the likelihood of locoregional recurrence. It is not what you take but what you leave behind that defines survival. Therefore, para-aortic lymph node dissection is safe and effective after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in both therapeutic and prophylactic settings. In this review, the efficacy of adequate lymph node dissection, also in a neoadjuvant setting, has been investigated in the key studies conducted to date on the topic.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsHumansLymph Node ExcisionNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisgastric cancerlymphadenectomyneoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID36661716
PMCPMC9858164
OpenAlexW4313893699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.