Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36661713›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Machine Learning Approaches with Textural Features to Calculate Breast Density on Mammography.

Mario Sansone, Roberta Fusco, Francesca Grassi, Gianluca Gatta, Maria Paola Belfiore, Francesca Angelone, Carlo Ricciardi, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Francesco Amato, Roberta Galdiero and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Machine Learning for Biomedical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SNSVM: SqueezeNet-Guided SVM for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Computers, materials & continua · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mario SansoneDepartment of Electrical Engineering Information Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3556-7771
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy.
Francesca GrassiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Division of Radiology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy.
Gianluca GattaDepartment of Precision Medicine, Division of Radiology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0874-8294
Maria Paola BelfioreDepartment of Precision Medicine, Division of Radiology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy.
Francesca AngeloneDepartment of Electrical Engineering Information Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.
Carlo RicciardiDepartment of Electrical Engineering Information Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-6432
Alfonso Maria PonsiglioneDepartment of Electrical Engineering Information Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1346-515X
Francesco AmatoDepartment of Electrical Engineering Information Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9053-3139
Roberta GaldieroDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8359-5107
Roberta GrassiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Division of Radiology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy.
Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221
Roberto GrassiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Division of Radiology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITIGEA Clinical Biophysics (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundbreast cancer (BC) is the world's most prevalent cancer in the female population, with 2.3 million new cases diagnosed worldwide in 2020. The great efforts made to set screening campaigns, early detection programs, and increasingly targeted treatments led to significant improvement in patients' survival. The Full-Field Digital Mammograph (FFDM) is considered the gold standard method for the early diagnosis of BC. From several previous studies, it has emerged that breast density (BD) is a risk factor in the development of BC, affecting the periodicity of screening plans present today at an international level.

objectivein this study, the focus is the development of mammographic image processing techniques that allow the extraction of indicators derived from textural patterns of the mammary parenchyma indicative of BD risk factors.

methodsa total of 168 patients were enrolled in the internal training and test set while a total of 51 patients were enrolled to compose the external validation cohort. Different Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been employed to classify breasts based on the values of the tissue density. Textural features were extracted only from breast parenchyma with which to train classifiers, thanks to the aid of ML algorithms.

resultsthe accuracy of different tested classifiers varied between 74.15% and 93.55%. The best results were reached by a Support Vector Machine (accuracy of 93.55% and a percentage of true positives and negatives equal to TPP = 94.44% and TNP = 92.31%). The best accuracy was not influenced by the choice of the features selection approach. Considering the external validation cohort, the SVM, as the best classifier with the 7 features selected by a wrapper method, showed an accuracy of 0.95, a sensitivity of 0.96, and a specificity of 0.90.

conclusionsour preliminary results showed that the Radiomics analysis and ML approach allow us to objectively identify BD.

Indexed as

Breast DensityBreast NeoplasmsBreastFemaleHumansMachine LearningMammographybreast cancerbreast densitymachine learningmammographyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36661713
PMCPMC9858566
OpenAlexW4313888578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.