Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36661686›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Second-Line Treatment of

Magdalena Knetki-Wróblewska, Sylwia Tabor, Adam Płużański, Zofia Lewandowska, Andrzej Tysarowski, Hubert Pawlik, Dariusz M Kowalski, Maciej Krzakowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magdalena Knetki-WróblewskaDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumours, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7603-099X
Sylwia TaborDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumours, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Adam PłużańskiDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumours, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-6445
Zofia LewandowskaDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumours, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej TysarowskiCancer Molecular and Genetic Diagnostics Department, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Hubert PawlikComputational Oncology Department, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Dariusz M KowalskiDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumours, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9452-3229
Maciej KrzakowskiDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumours, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) into daily practice allows for the identification of a greater number of molecular abnormalities. We aimed to confirm the benefits of immunotherapy in the group of patients with KRAS aberrations treated within clinical practice. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of the patients (pts) treated in routine practice within the National Drug Programme in Poland. The NGS was performed using a FusionPlex Comprehensive Thyroid and Lung (CTL) kit (ArcherDx) and sequenced using a MiniSeq (Illumina). The analyses were performed with the R language environment, version 4.1.3. Results A total of 96 pts with chemotherapy-pre-treated advanced NSCLC (CS III−IV) were qualified for nivolumab or atezolizumab treatment following a molecular diagnosis by the NGS and the exclusion of EGFR and ALK gene abnormalities. A mutation in the KRAS gene was found in 26 patients (27%); among them, the variant p.Gly12Cyc (G12C) was the most common (42%). The median PFS and OS for the overall population were 2 months (95% CI: 1.8−2.75) and 10 months (95% CI: 6.9−16.2), respectively. No differences were observed in terms of the mPFS between the KRAS-mutated and KRAS wild-type (WT) patients. A trend toward a longer OS was observed in the group of patients with the KRAS mutation, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.43). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of mutations in the KRAS gene had no prognostic significance, while the occurence of grade 3 toxicity and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3.5 were found as statistically significant factors. Conclusions Immunotherapy in the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC allows for a benefit regardless of the KRAS gene mutation status. The treatment sequence, including molecularly targeted drugs such as sotorasib and adagrasib, is still discussed. The NGS is a valuable method to identify a variety of molecular abnormalities in patients with NSCLC in daily practice.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)atezolizumabimmunotherapyKRAS genenivolumabNSCLC

Identifiers

PMID36661686
PMCPMC9858515
OpenAlexW4313362540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.