Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36661683›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GIST) of the Rectum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shaheer I Khan, Niall J O'Sullivan, Hugo C Temperley, Emanuele Rausa, Brian J Mehigan, Paul McCormick, John O Larkin, Dara O Kavanagh, Michael E Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaheer I KhanRoyal College of Surgeons, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5550-583X
Niall J O'SullivanDepartment of Surgery, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.
Hugo C TemperleyDepartment of Surgery, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.
Emanuele RausaFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6780-1783
Brian J MehiganDepartment of Surgery, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.
Paul McCormickDepartment of Surgery, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.
John O LarkinDepartment of Surgery, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.
Dara O KavanaghRoyal College of Surgeons, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland.
Michael E KellyDepartment of Surgery, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0757-6411
Trinity College Dublin · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITSt. James's Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) have many treatment options, but uncertainty remains regarding the best treatment regimen for this rare pathology. The aim of this review is to assess the optimal management approach including timing of chemotherapy. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles comparing the impact of radical vs. local excision, and neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant therapy had on outcomes in the management of rectal GISTs. We specifically evaluated the influence that the aforementioned factors had on margins, recurrence, overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and hospital length of stay. Results: Twenty-eight studies met our predefined criteria and were included in our study, twelve of which were included in the quantitative synthesis. When comparing neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, our meta-analysis noted no significance in terms of margin negativity (R0) (odds ratio [OR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7−5.79, p = 0.20) or recurrence rates (OR 0.22, 95% CI, 0.02−1.91, p = 0.17). However, there was a difference in overall 5-year survival in favour of neoadjuvant therapy (OR 3.19, 95% CI, 1.37−7.40, * p = 0.007). Comparing local excision versus radical excision, our meta-analysis observed no significance in terms of overall 5-year survival (OR1.31, 95% CI, 0.81−2.12, p = 0.26), recurrence (OR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.40−1.13, p = 0.12), or 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.10, 95% CI, 0.55−2.19, p = 0.80). There was a difference in length of hospital stay with a reduced mean length of stay in local excision group (mean difference [MD] 6.74 days less in the LE group; 95% CI, −6.92−−6.56, * p =< 0.00001) as well as a difference in R0 rates in favour of radical resection (OR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.47−0.99, * p = 0.05). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall 5-year survival, while local excision is associated with reduced mean length of hospital stay. Further large-volume, prospective studies are required to further define the optimal treatment regimen in this complex pathology.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsRectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalHumansRectumchemotherapygastrointestinal stromal tumourlocal excisionoverall survivalradical resectionrectal GIST

Identifiers

PMID36661683
PMCPMC9857930
OpenAlexW4313328792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.