Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36661591›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Nudge Research Using VOSviewer.

Chenjin Jia, Hasrina Mustafa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Bibliometric analysis of occupational exposure in operating room from 1973 to 2022.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chenjin JiaSchool of Communication, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Malaysia.
Hasrina MustafaSchool of Communication, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5256-6343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With growing demands of decision making in the current era, the impact of the drivers behind individuals' preferences and institutional strategies becomes prominent. Coined in 2008,

Indexed as

bibliometric analysischoice architecturenudgeVOSviewerWeb of Science

Identifiers

PMID36661591
PMCPMC9854859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.