Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660734›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Comparison study of clinicopathological features of cellular schwannoma between retroperitoneum and other sites.

Xiaoying Zhang, Liping Lu, Yanfeng Zhong, Lihua Wang, Yubo Ren

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoying ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liping LuDepartment of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanfeng ZhongDepartment of Pathology, Department of Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Lihua WangDepartment of Pathology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yubo RenDepartment of Pathology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University International Hospital · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cellular schwannoma (CS) is a relatively rare neural tumor with few reports. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics of CS in the retroperitoneum and other sites by analyzing the hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining results, to provide some help for pathological diagnosis. Methods: A total of 79 CS cases from the Department of Pathology, Peking University International Hospital were collected, and the diagnosis was based on the 5 Results: Compared with other sites, the volume of retroperitoneal CS tumors were larger (t=4.265, P=0.001) and more likely to recur (χ Conclusions: It founded that Retroperitoneal CS was often positive for GFAP and CK, suggesting it originated from unmyelinated Schwann cells. CS in other sites, the expression of GFAP and CK was often negative, indicating they derived from myelinated Schwann cells. The expression of MBP in the peripheral nerve sheath structure of CS can be used to determine whether the tumor originates from myelinated or unmyelinated Schwann cells. These findings may provide a reference for revealing pathogenesis, diagnosis and evaluating prognosis of CS.

Indexed as

cellular schwannomas (CS)immunohistochemistryRetroperitoneal

Identifiers

PMID36660734
PMCPMC9843353
OpenAlexW4312870197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.