Overview of triple negative breast cancer prognostic signatures in the context of data science-driven clinico-genomics research.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Old Drugs, New Battles: Unleashing Repurposed Drug Classes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
   Review
2. Biomarkers derived from CmP signal network in triple negative breast cancers.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2023
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Identification of a novel signature with prognostic value in triple-negative breast cancer through clinico-transcriptomic analysis.2022

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as