Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660716›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision for the treatment of clinical benign breast lesions larger than 3 cm: a retrospective cohort study.

Bo Wang, Ying Jiang, Meng-Ke Zhang, Shi-Yu Li, Rui-Lan Niu, Gang Liu, Zhi-Li Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bo Wang *Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Ying Jiang *School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Meng-Ke ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shi-Yu LiMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Rui-Lan NiuMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Gang Liu *Department of Radiology, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Li Wang *Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision (US-VAE) has become a scarless solution for the removal of benign breast lesions. This procedure is now favored by more and more female patients for its satisfactory cosmetic outcome and few postoperative complications. However, controversy have been raised regarding its efficacy and safety in treating larger benign breast lesions. This study aimed to evaluate whether US-VAE is sufficient for the treatment of clinical benign breast lesions larger than 3 cm and to investigate the lesion features that affect the complete excision rate and hematoma occurrence rate. Methods: From January 2018 to July 2021, a total of 1,812 lesions in 1,367 patients underwent US-VAE at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. A total of 89 benign breast lesions in 87 patients enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The baseline clinical characteristics and ultrasonographic features of the lesions were recorded. Patients were followed up by US to record if there are any serious issues and the occurrence of hematoma and the recurrence of the lesions within 3 days and 6-12 months later, then at 1-year intervals. Lesions were classified to analyze the possible factors associated with complete excision rate and hematoma occurrence rate. Results: The mean age was 35.9±9.5 years (range, 18-54 years), and the median maximum size of benign breast lesions was 3.5 cm (range, 3.1-5.0 cm). The complete excision rate was 91.0% (81/89). Histopathology (P=0.002) and vascularity (P=0.032) of lesions showed statistically significant differences in groups with or without recurrent lesions. A total of 17 cases (17/89, 19.1%) presented with hematoma after the procedure. The maximum lesion size in patients with hematoma was significantly larger than that in those without hematoma (P<0.001). Conclusions: US-VAE is an effective and safe alternative method for the treatment of benign breast lesions larger than 3 cm, especially for fibroadenoma, adenosis, hamartoma. For benign phyllodes tumors and intraductal papillomas larger than 3 cm and lesions with hypervascularity, the possibility of recurrence after US-VAE should be noted. The size of lesions needs to be considered when evaluating the occurrence of hematoma after US-VAE.

Indexed as

benign breast lesionscomplete excision ratehematoma occurrence rateUltrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision (US-VAE)

Identifiers

PMID36660716
PMCPMC9843416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.