ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2022
Quantitative evaluation of anastomotic perfusion during colorectal surgery via indocyanine green fluorescence angiography: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided perfusion vs. standard assessment to prevent clinical anastomotic leak after colorectal resection: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with site-specific subgroup analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Real-time visualization of human colonic vascular architecture using 33-MHz high-frequency ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Article
- Precision minimally invasive strategy for Hirschsprung's disease: from anatomical resection to whole-cycle functional management-a review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Article
- Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective before and after study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Near-infrared indocyanine green angiography in recognizing bowel ischemia in emergency surgery: game changer or overrated?Innovative surgical sciences · 2024Review
- Optimizing Indocyanine Green Dosage for Near-Infrared Fluorescence Perfusion Assessment in Bowel Anastomosis: A Prospective, Systematic Dose-Ranging Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Quantitative studies of indocyanine green (ICG) are needed to optimize its evaluative potential in anastomotic perfusion during colorectal surgery. However, some limitations still existed in current studies about qualitative evaluations such as small-scale studies, the inconsistent concentration of the drug, the method of injection, etc. Therefore, this review summarized the primary quantitative parameters, image, method, and so on, during ICG fluorescence angiography aiming to further provide a theoretical basis for the application of ICG in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods: The following keywords "indocyanine green or ICG", "anastomotic perfusion", and "colorectal surgery" were applied to search for literature published from 2002 to 2022 in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Medline databases. Then, the information about ICG fluorescence angiography in quantitative evaluation of anastomotic perfusion during colorectal surgery was summarized. Through integrating the experiences derived from the literature and our research center, the crucial quantitative parameters [such as T0, Tmax, Fmax, and S (Fmax/Tmax)], image characteristics, and standard operational process for ICG fluorescence angiography were summarized. Key Content and Findings: Firstly, quantitative parameters, including T0, Tmax, Fmax, and S (Fmax/Tmax) during the ICG fluorescence angiography could predict anastomotic leakage, and thus should be recorded. Secondly, the image curve generated by the software might differ among patients, which included a filling period, reducing period, and platform period; some patients even presented a second fluorescence intensity peak. Finally, present studies presented great heterogeneity regarding the injection dose of ICG, observation distance from the laparoscope to the anastomotic site, software, and so on, during ICG fluorescence angiography in quantitatively evaluating the intestinal blood perfusion. Conclusions: This review points out the challenges of ICG fluorescence angiography in quantitative evaluation of anastomotic perfusion and gives some advice. However, some difficulties and issues are non-neglectable during the clinical implications of the quantitative evaluation of ICG, such as standardizing the specific cut-off value about the quantitative parameters, injection dose of ICG, observation distance from the laparoscope to the anastomotic site, software, and so on, during ICG fluorescence angiography in quantitatively evaluating the intestinal blood perfusion to eliminate heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.