ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Comparison of clinical outcomes of conservative treatment and surgery for esophageal cancer patients who achieve a clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does Lymph Node Dissection During Esophagectomy Impact the Long-Term Prognosis for Complete Responders After Neoadjuvant Therapy? A Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Organ preservation in esophageal cancer treatment, is it time now?World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although the clinical complete response (cCR) for esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) may be related to the good survival prognosis, the choice of conservative and surgical treatments is still controversial. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of these two treatments. Methods: A systematic search was conducted according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to retrieve articles published between January 1, 2010 and March 31, 2022 on the efficacy of conservative treatment or surgery in esophageal cancer patients who had achieved a cCR after nCRT The predominant endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free-survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for the dichotomous variants by meta-analysis. The software implemented was Stata 16.0 MP. This research was prospectively registered under PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022332143). Results: Ultimately, eight retrospective cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial, comprising 749 patients (nCRT group: 333 and nCRT + surgery group: 416), were included in the meta-analysis after two researchers independently assessed the risk of bias for all included studies. The 2-year OS [OR =1.239, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.891 to 1.723] and 5-year OS (OR =1.369, 95% CI: 0.963 to 1.947) were comparable between the nCRT group and nCRT plus surgery (nCRT + S) group. Patients in the nCRT + S group had significantly longer DFS (2 and 5 years, OR ranging from 0.303 to 0.357) and lower local recurrence rate (OR =0.179, 95% CI: 0.104 to 0.291) than those in the nCRT group. However, the distant metastasis rate was similar between the nCRT group and the nCRT + S group. Conclusions: Esophageal cancer patients who achieved a cCR after nCRT and received an esophagectomy had better DFS and lower local recurrence than those who received conservative treatment; however, this DFS advantage did not lead to a significant difference in OS. Salvage surgery may be a feasible option for resectable patients who have local recurrence after achieving cCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.