Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660649›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

The comparative efficacy and safety of 9 traditional Chinese medicines combined with standard quadruple therapy for

Zhixian Bao, Guobing Wu, Jie Du, Yuwei Ye, Ya Zheng, Yuping Wang, Rui Ji

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The effects and mechanisms of natural products onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhixian Bao *The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Guobing Wu *The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jie Du *School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yuwei YeDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Ya ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yuping WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Rui JiDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Lanzhou University · CNFirst Hospital of Lanzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are 9 traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) combined with standard quadruple (SQ) available for the treatment of Methods: We performed a search of electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese databases and South Korean database from inception to March 2022 to identify all relevant RCTs on the comparison between TCM combined with SQ and SQ for Hp-associated gastritis. Efficacy outcomes were the eradication rate of Hp and therapeutic response rate, and safety outcome was incidence of adverse reactions. Publication bias was assessed quantitatively using Egger's regression analysis and qualitatively using trim-and-fill method. Quality assessment was performed using Cochrane Risk of Bias, version 2 (ROB 2) tool. The Bayesian methods were applied to compare each treatment. Results: A total of 55 trials with 6,187 patients were involved. The experimental group included 9 TCMs combined with SQ. The control group was SQ. The pair-wise meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with control group, 8 TCMs combined with SQ could statistically improve the eradication rate of Hp in patients with gastritis, 9 TCMs combined with SQ could significantly improve the therapeutic response rate. Additionally, Banxia Xiexin decoction combined with SQ (BXS) could statistically decrease the incidence of adverse reactions. The network meta-analysis results showed that BXS, Xiangsha Liujunzi combined with SQ (XSS), and Huangqi Jianzhong decoction combined with SQ (HQS) was the best measures to effectively eradicate Hp, enhance therapeutic effect, and decrease adverse reactions, respectively. The results of trim-and-fill method indicated that the results were stable and less affected by publication bias. Conclusions: Compared with SQ, TCM combined with SQ generally has a better clinical effect and higher safety in patients with Hp-associated gastritis. BXS, XSS, and HQS are recommended based on the patient's condition and needs in clinical practice. Further high-quality double-blinded RCTs are warranted to validate the conclusions.

Indexed as

gastritisHelicobacter pylorinetwork meta-analysisTraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID36660649
PMCPMC9843361
OpenAlexW4313313664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.