ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Apatinib in the treatment of gastric cancer in Henan Province: a multicenter prospective real-world observational study (Ahead-HAP01).
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Apatinib is approved in China for the treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma that had progressed or relapsed after standard systemic chemotherapy treatments. However, the effectiveness of Apatinib under real-world condition has not been evaluated and the drug performance under ideal and controlled circumstances has not been validated. In fact, genetic factors, poor healthcare access, social economic status, comorbidities compliance and other factors play significant role in drug performance under "real-world" conditions. Real-world experience can help validate the safety and efficacy of apatinib. Methods: In this observational, prospective study we evaluated the safety and efficacy of Apatinib in patient treated in China. Between March 2018 and March 2019, a total of 943 patients with gastric cancer treated with Apatinib were enrolled. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 were used to evaluate efficacy and adverse effects. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.65 months (5.22-6.05 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.47 months (10.41-12.52 months). Apatinib in combination with more than two agents was superior to single agent apatinib in overall response rate (ORR) [18.18% Conclusions: Efficacy of Apatinib in this observational study is promising and toxicities are manageable. Combination of Apatinib with chemotherapy agents has a higher response rate and better disease control at the expense of increased serious adverse events. Better OS can be achieved by receiving apatinib treatment earlier. As a supplement and further validation of explanatory randomized controlled trials, the real-world study reflects the real efficacy of apatinib in practical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.