ReviewInternational journal of nephrology and renovascular disease2023
The Clinical Manifestations and Efficacy of Different Treatments Used for Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review.
Review in International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach From the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Tenth Special Issue.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Guideline
- State of Practice: ASNR Statement on Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Use in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Guideline
- An Integrative Genotyping and Gene Expression Profiling of the Mutated Human FAM111B Gene and Fibrosis-Associated Pathway in the POIKTMP Syndrome.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a rare disorder that occurs in association majorly with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The lack of collective quantitative data on its clinical manifestations and the different treatment options' efficacy, call the need for our investigation. Methods: A systematic review was conducted covering a timeline from inception up to July 2022 without any restrictions. Article screening and data extraction were performed independently on PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library. The keywords that we used were CKD, NSF, Gadolinium enduced fibrosis, etc; shortlisted articles were assessed for risk of bias. Data were presented as frequencies and percentages, with a confidence interval of 95%. A chi-square test was also done to find significant relationships, with a Results: We had 83 patients in this review consisting of 44 (55.7%) females with a mean age of 51.4±14.6 years. Sixty-nine (83.1%) patients had chronic kidney disease predisposition to NSF. Previous exposure to gadolinium-based contrast dyes was seen in 66 (79.5%) patients). The most common symptom in patients was cutaneous lesions in 69 (83.1%) patients. The most used treatments were ultraviolet therapy, renal transplant, and extracorporeal photopheresis; in 13.3% of the patients each. Condition in most patients either improved (67.1%) or remained stable (11.8%). Chi-square testing found that the treatments offered were also seen to be significantly related to outcome (p=0.015). Conclusion: The findings in this study provide a quantitative measurement of NSF's presentations and treatment efficacies. This serves to make way for researchers to form comprehensive guidelines on the presentation-based treatment of NSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.