ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2023
Preseptal and Pretarsal Botulinum Toxin Injection in Hemifacial Spasm and Blepharospasm: A 10-Year Comparative Study.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Botulinum Toxin: A Non-surgical Approach for Non-myasthenic Mild-to-Moderate Blepharoptosis Treatment.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of onabotulinum toxin type-A injection techniques in older adults with blepharospasm: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Preseptal and pretarsal botulinum toxin injections are approved for treatment of hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm. However, the long-term data is limited. We compared the efficacy, safety, and costs between preseptal and pretarsal injection in hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm. Patients and Methods: The data were retrieved between 2011 and 2021. Consecutive hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm botulinum toxin patients were categorized as preseptal or pretarsal. Study outcomes were the difference in pre-and post-treatment modified Jankovic scale, self-reporting scales, time-related treatment, safety, and cost. Results: Of 152 botulinum toxin-injected patients, 117 (77.0%) patients had hemifacial spasm and 35 (33.0%) patients had blepharospasm. Analysis included data pertinent to 1665 injections in hemifacial spasm (920 preseptal and 745 pretarsal) and 527 injections in blepharospasm (210 preseptal and 317 pretarsal). The difference between pre-and post-treatment modified Jankovic scale was lower in the preseptal group than in the pretarsal group in both hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm (1.5±0.8 vs 1.8±0.6, P-value <0.001 and 1.8±0.8 vs 3.1±0.9, P-value <0.001). There was no difference in duration of maximum response in hemifacial spasm between groups, while the blepharospasm with preseptal had a longer duration than blepharospasm with pretarsal. The preseptal injection was associated with more adverse events overall than the pretarsal (9.4% vs 5.2%, P-value <0.001). The total dose and cost per session in the preseptal group is lower for onabotulinum toxin but higher for abobotulinum toxin. Conclusion: Pretarsal injections reduced symptom severity with fewer side effects. Further studies on the pharmacoeconomics of both techniques are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.