ArticleCureus2022
Improving the Timeliness of Discharge Summary Communication: A Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Follow-up pathways, investigation utilisation, and general practitioner communication following acute medical unit assessment: A six-month retrospective service evaluation.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Design and Implementation of an Electronic Patient Record via Adaptation of Existing Hospital Software.Cureus · 2025Article
- Striking the right balance between accountability and quality improvement: a discharge summary timeliness tale.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction A recognised problem in the Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital and across the NHS is that discharge summaries are often sent to general practitioners (GP) long after the patient is discharged, or not at all. This is a safety issue when for example the summary includes time-sensitive requests for the GP or information relevant to ongoing care. Methods A quality improvement project was devised to tackle this important problem. First, the Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital's electronic patient record system was used to construct a report allowing measurement of the scale of this problem and stratification by factors such as discharging department or ward. This report identified that 22.6% (12,965/57,367) of discharge summaries are sent outside the Trust's target (two working days from discharge). A three-pronged approach was devised targeting discharges of deceased patients using educational material, discharges from a medical ward using an automated list, and finally optimising the technical steps required to send a discharge summary to attempt to reduce the delay. Results Plan, do, study and act (PDSA) cycles were implemented, one targeting discharges for deceased patients and another targeting discharges from a medical ward. Though not sustained, the former resulted in a six-week increase in the percentage of discharge summaries sent within the target from 50% to 80%. The latter did not lead to improvement due to a number of factors including workload in the midst of a global pandemic and other factors explored in a root cause analysis. The most ambitious intervention aimed to automate an administrative step, which proved challenging due to software and human factors. As such this intervention was not completed during the study period. Conclusion The sending of discharge summaries is often delayed and this has potential consequences for patient care. This study has used the hospital's electronic patient record system to create a report which provides detailed information on areas with the most potential for improvement. Though the targeted interventions were respectively nonsustained, unsuccessful and not implemented, this data can suggest reasons behind poor performance and therefore targets for future interventions, illustrating great sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.