ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Biofilms-What Should the Orthopedic Surgeon know?
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ion-paired antibiotics in PLGA nanoparticles: improving encapsulation efficiency and musculoskeletal infection treatment.RSC advances · 2025Article
- State of Art and Perspective of Calcium Phosphate-Based Coatings Coupled with Bioactive Compounds for Orthopedic Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Adjunctive Antiseptic Lavage Solution in Managing Acute Hip/Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Comparative Study in a Tertiary Revision Center.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Pathogens in FRI - Do bugs matter? - An analysis of FRI studies to assess your enemy.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- In Vitro Efficacy of Dalbavancin as a Long-Acting Anti-Biofilm Agent Loaded in Bone Cement.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal infections are a major source of morbidity for orthopedic and trauma patients, are associated with prolonged treatment times, and, unfortunately, suffer from poor functional outcomes. Further complicating the issue, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is increasingly impacting the treatment of musculoskeletal infections with a diminishing repertoire of effective antibiotic agents for some highly resistant pathogens. Most orthopedic surgical procedures involve implants, and the formation of bacterial biofilms on these implants is now recognized as a major factor contributing to the failure of antibiotic therapy in orthopedic surgery. Methods: This review presents an overview of the types, structure, formation, and pathogenesis of biofilms as they pertain to musculoskeletal infections. Furthermore, it describes the key concepts in the management of biofilms and future perspectives for the better treatment of patients with biofilm-related musculoskeletal infections. Results: A bacterial biofilm is a dynamic, living conglomerate of bacteria encased in an extracapsular polysaccharide matrix (EPS). Biofilms are a natural mode of survival for virtually all bacterial species, including both Grampositive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungi. The biofilm model of growth confers resistance by several well-defined mechanisms regardless of the species of the microorganism. In most cases, biofilm management often necessitates radical measures to ensure eradication including both surgical and medical interventions. Conclusions: Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the key concepts pertaining to biofilms, and the impact that these can have on clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.