ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2022
3D Patient-Specific Biomechanical Model of the Tongue for the Management of Tongue Tumors: Conceptualization to Reality.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Craniomaxillofacial Surgery with Computer-generated Three-dimensional Solid Models.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Increasing use of tobacco by the younger generation has resulted in an increase in oral cavity tumors. Surgical treatment is radical and results in severe functional morbidity. Using computer-aided designing technology, surgical and rehabilitative planning can be better. We present here our concept of a patient-specific biomechanical 3D model of the tongue and its clinical utility in the management of tongue tumors. Methods: Using fused deposition modeling, the 3D model of the tongue was printed which easily differentiates the tumor and the uninvolved tongue by printing in two different colors. The 3D tongue model was used by the surgical and rehabilitation teams to frame the treatment and plan the rehabilitation taking into account the patient preferences and needs. The model was used in two patients with operable squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the tongue, and the utility of the model in margin planning, surgical defect assessment, and its aid in the reconstruction and rehabilitation was assessed. Results: Two patients with Stage III SCC of the tongue underwent the surgery based on the plan evolved from the 3D model. All the surgical margins assessed by the frozen section analysis were clear. The model helped in addressing the discordance between patient expectations and surgical outcomes. We found that the model aided the reconstructive surgeon in planning the flap harvest based on the pre-operative defect assessment, which, in turn, translated into better rehabilitative outcomes. Conclusion: 3D biomechanical tongue model is a novel concept and aids in improving the overall treatment outcomes. The realistic 3D reconstructed image model helps the oncologist in planning the resection, enables the reconstructive surgery to more precisely predict the defect volume, and lastly the rehabilitative team in developing better rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.