Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660368›Full record

ReviewACS energy letters2023

Zero-Gap Electrochemical CO

Mark Sassenburg, Maria Kelly, Siddhartha Subramanian, Wilson A Smith, Thomas Burdyny

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS energy letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Product-Reshaped Gas-Phase Hydrodynamics Govern COAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Operando Diagnosis of Acidic COSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Influence of COEnergy & fuels : an American Chemical Society journal · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Chemistry of COChemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tandem architectures for electrochemical CONature nanotechnology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gaseous COChemical science · 2026
    Review
  14. Persistent COEnergy & fuels : an American Chemical Society journal · 2026
    Article
  15. Enzymatic Flow Electrolyzer for COAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. COEnergy & fuels : an American Chemical Society journal · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark SassenburgMaterials for Energy Conversion and Storage (MECS), Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 ZHDelft, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-7765
Maria KellyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering and Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute (RASEI), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado80303, United States.
Siddhartha SubramanianMaterials for Energy Conversion and Storage (MECS), Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 ZHDelft, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7992-3849
Wilson A SmithMaterials for Energy Conversion and Storage (MECS), Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 ZHDelft, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7757-5281
Thomas BurdynyMaterials for Energy Conversion and Storage (MECS), Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 ZHDelft, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8057-9558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salt precipitation is a problem in electrochemical CO

Identifiers

PMID36660368
PMCPMC9841607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.