ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Large Ovarian Masses.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of conventional multiport laparoscopy, single-port laparoscopy, and vNOTES for the management of large adnexal masses (≥ 10 cm): a retrospective cohort study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- A Novel Hybrid Laparoscopic-Extracorporeal Technique for Fertility-Preserving Management of Large Benign Ovarian Cysts: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive surgery (robot-assisted or laparoscopic) versus open surgery for presumed benign ovarian tumours.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Ovarian Growths in Young Women.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Development of a Personalized and Simplified Ovarian Cystectomy Practice Tool.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Gynecologists in Five Steps.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Laparoscopic Surgical Management of an Iatrogenic Tubo-ovarian Abscess Following Hysteroscopy in a Sexually Inexperienced Female.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for large ovarian masses with benign features. Materials and Methods: Women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for an ovarian mass with benign features between 2017 and 2019 at a tertiary referral center were included in the retrospective study. Based on the size of the ovarian mass, the women were divided into the case and control groups of ≥10 cm and <10 cm, respectively. Clinical characteristics, operative findings, histopathological results, and complication rates of the groups were compared. Results: A total of 260 women, 64 women with large masses and 196 with small masses were included in the study. The operation time, intraoperative cyst rupture rate, complication rate, and hospital stay were similar in the case and control groups ( Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery was found feasible for the treatment of women with large ovarian masses. However, a higher unexpected malignancy rate requires the careful patient selection and appropriate counseling preoperatively in these cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.