Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660312›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2023

Defining priorities for emergency medical services education research: A modified Delphi study.

Scott Lancaster, William J Leggio, Stephanie Ashford, Elliot Carhart, Kim D McKenna, Remle P Crowe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Defining priorities for emergency medical services education research: A modified Delphi study.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Scott LancasterCataldo Ambulance Service Somerville Massachusetts USA.
William J LeggioOffice of the Chief Medical Officer Austin Texas USA.
Stephanie AshfordSt. Charles County Ambulance District St. Peter's Missouri USA.
Elliot CarhartDepartment of Clinical Health Professions Radford University Roanoke Virginia USA.
Kim D McKennaUnaffiliated, Independent Researcher St. Louis Missouri USA.
Remle P CroweESO, Inc. Austin Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9733-9294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: As out-of-hospital medicine evolves, emergency medical services (EMS) education practices must also be updated to ensure that EMS professionals acquire and maintain the skills needed to best serve patients. We aimed to identify and rank the top 10 research priorities related to EMS education in the United States. Methods: We conducted a convenience survey of EMS educators to identify challenges facing EMS education before leveraging a purposefully selected panel of EMS educators to prioritize research gaps through a modified Delphi approach. Data were collected electronically (March 2021-June 2021) over 4 survey rounds consisting of idea generation (Rounds 1 and 2), importance scoring (Round 3), and consensus ranking (Round 4). At the end of Round 4, composite scores were used to generate a list of 10 prioritized research gaps related to EMS education. Results: In the pre-Delphi survey, 463 EMS educators identified 2055 challenges facing EMS education. We recruited 32 EMS education experts as Delphi panelists and 28 completed all 4 rounds. Panelists submitted 77 knowledge gaps. The top 10 knowledge gaps included defining competency of EMS learners and educators, association of curricula and accreditation requirements with real-world practice, the effects of diversity and cultural humility among educators and learners on equitable patient care, evidence-based teaching methods, and public perception of the EMS profession and education system. Conclusions: Although 10 gaps were prioritized, panelists deemed all 77 gaps as having considerable importance for EMS education. This suite of knowledge gaps is intended to guide researchers and research-funding bodies for future resource allocation.

Identifiers

PMID36660312
PMCPMC9838566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.