Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660309›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Intraocular Pressure and Medication Changes Associated with Xen Gel Stent: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Joseph F Panarelli, Vanessa Vera, Arsham Sheybani, Nathan Radcliffe, Richard Fiscella, Brian A Francis, Oluwatosin U Smith, Robert J Noecker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using a Novel, Subconjunctival, Sustained-Release Mitomycin C Formulation in a Rabbit Model of Filtration Surgery with Gel Stent Implantation.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph F PanarelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Vanessa VeraAllergan, an AbbVie Company, Dublin, Ireland.
Arsham SheybaniDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Nathan RadcliffeDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3976-6831
Richard FiscellaAllergan, an AbbVie Company, Dublin, Ireland.
Brian A FrancisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Oluwatosin U SmithGlaucoma Associates of Texas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Robert J NoeckerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Allergan (Ireland) · IEGlaucoma Associates of Texas · USNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary · USNew York University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USWashington University in St. Louis · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Xen gel stent (Allergan Inc, an AbbVie company; Dublin, Ireland) was conceived as an option for patients requiring modest IOP reduction but for whom trabeculectomy was not yet indicated. As with any glaucoma surgery, establishing criteria for patient selection and identifying factors that contribute to a high likelihood of success are important. To help guide clinical decision-making, a systematic review of published studies on the gel stent was performed, with the goal of understanding postoperative outcomes based on clinical and patient factors. Results were organized around a series of pertinent clinical questions based on scenarios encountered in clinical practice. Criteria for including studies were intentionally broad, with the objective of simulating the diverse population of glaucoma patients encountered in real-world practice. Outcomes for IOP and medication reduction postoperatively were assessed in various analyses, including in eyes with various glaucoma types and severity; in eyes naïve to surgery as well as those with a history of prior incisional glaucoma surgery; and when surgery was performed as a standalone procedure or at the time of cataract surgery. The results of each of the various analyses were consistent in demonstrating that successful gel stent surgery achieved a postoperative IOP of approximately 14.0 mm Hg and reduction to fewer than 1 glaucoma medication. Additional data are shown on outcomes by method of implant (ab interno vs ab externo); intraoperative use of antifibrotics; and rates of needling in published studies.

Indexed as

blebgel stentglaucomaglaucoma surgeryXen

Identifiers

PMID36660309
PMCPMC9845068
OpenAlexW4313589446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.