Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660297›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2022

Development of 3D Printed Electrospun Scaffolds for the Fabrication of Porous Scaffolds for Vascular Applications.

Jahnvi Bansal, Katelyn Neuman, Vaughn K Greene, David A Rubenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jahnvi BansalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0793-563X
Katelyn NeumanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0038-0432
Vaughn K GreeneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1851-3088
David A RubensteinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-9049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, electrospinning has emerged as a common technique to produce biomedical scaffolds composed of ultrafine fibers formed from many natural and synthetic polymers. A major advantage of this technique is the ability to produce scaffolds that resemble the native extracellular matrix in physical, chemical, and topological properties. However, scaffolds fabricated via electrospinning are not formed with a controlled architecture and typically do a poor job of directing cell growth into prescribed structures for tissue/organ development. To address these weaknesses, 3D bioprinting has recently been used to develop scaffolds that have a highly organized and precise global topology. Unfortunately, these 3D bioprinted scaffolds do not typically resemble the native extracellular matrix in physical properties, such as porosity, fiber diameter, and pore size (e.g., the microarchitecture). Thus, the goal of the current study was to develop a technique that harnesses the intrinsic advantages of both conventional electrospinning and 3D bioprinting techniques to produce scaffolds that have the potential to be used within biomedical applications. The physical properties of formed 3D printed electrospun scaffolds were compared with conventional electrospun and 3D printed scaffolds. Further, we conducted initial proof-of-concept biocompatibility studies to illustrate the applicability of the scaffolds within vascular applications. Our results illustrate that 3D printed electrospun scaffolds can be developed, via our technique, that have highly tailored and organized arbitrary geometries with scaffold properties in the range of the innate extracellular matrix. In addition, these scaffolds were shown to support endothelial cell growth. Therefore, we illustrate the development and testing of a novel bioscaffold fabrication technique that may be used for many tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications, which allows for the direct printing of electrospun scaffolds into well-defined macro-scale geometries that also retain the micro-structures commonly observed in electrospun scaffolds.

Indexed as

3D printingbiomedical scaffoldselectrospinningporosity

Identifiers

PMID36660297
PMCPMC9831558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.