ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2022
Investigation of clinical findings and CT scan in children with minor head trauma.
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consideration of Brain CT Imaging Standard for Mild Head Injuries.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2024Article
- Article
- The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography in the diagnosis and monitoring of large vessel vasculitides - a review article.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Review
- Association between patellofemoral osteoarthritis with demographic features and anatomical variants of the knee in non-traumatic patients.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe most common cause of death or severe impairment in children older than one-year-old is traumatic brain injury (TBI). Assessing TBI in children with minor head trauma (MHT) using clinical findings from history-taking and a physical exam is crucial to minimizing unnecessary brain CTs and more accurately predicting TBI. We aimed to evaluate the findings of brain CT scans in children with mild head trauma and their relationship with clinical signs and symptoms to avoid unnecessary interventions in many children with MHT.
methodsThis cross-sectional-analytical study was performed to evaluate the findings of brain CT scans in children with MHT and their relationship with clinical signs and symptoms that were referred to Poursina Hospital in Rasht in the first half of 2021. Children were divided into two age groups: under two years and 2-12 years, and analyzed separately. Initially, a list containing all demographic information, patients' clinical signs, and symptoms were prepared. The collected data were then analyzed using SPSS software version 26.
resultsAccording to the results, the mean age of patients was 66.01 months and 88 were boys (56.4%). The most common mechanism of injury was falling from a height. Most patients had isolated head injuries. Among the accompanying injuries, facial injuries were the most common. Among the clinical factors studied, cranial fracture on CT scan and GCS less than 15 were significantly associated with the occurrence of traumatic brain injury on CT scan. In addition, cranial fracture on CT scan, injury severity, and history of vomiting had the highest positive predictive value, respectively.
conclusionStandard history and clinical examination are sufficient to identify high-risk cases of pediatric head injuries. GCS is the most important risk factor for pediatric MHT. Requesting a CT scan is not recommended without these risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36660263PMC9845804W4317568129What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.