Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660251›Full record

ArticleACS applied polymer materials2023

Effects of Feed Solution pH on Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Nanofiltration Membranes.

Moritz A Junker, Jurjen A Regenspurg, Cristobal I Valdes Rivera, Esra Te Brinke, Wiebe M de Vos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied polymer materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moritz A JunkerMembrane Science and Technology, University of Twente, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AEEnschede, The Netherlands.
Jurjen A RegenspurgMembrane Science and Technology, University of Twente, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AEEnschede, The Netherlands.
Cristobal I Valdes RiveraMembrane Science and Technology, University of Twente, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AEEnschede, The Netherlands.
Esra Te BrinkeMembrane Science and Technology, University of Twente, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AEEnschede, The Netherlands.
Wiebe M de VosMembrane Science and Technology, University of Twente, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AEEnschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0133-1931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM)-based membranes have gained a lot of interest in the field of nanofiltration (NF) as an alternative to conventional polyamide-based thin film composite membranes. With great variety in fabrication conditions, these membranes can achieve superior properties such as high chemical resistance and excellent filtration performance. Some of the most common polyelectrolytes used to prepare NF membranes are weak, meaning that their charge density depends on pH within the normal window of operation relevant for potential applications (pH 0-14). This might cause a dependency of membrane properties on the pH of filtered solutions, as indicated by other applications of PEMs. In this work, the susceptibility of membrane structure (swelling and surface charge) and performance (permeability, molecular weight cutoff, and salt retention) toward the pH of the filtration solution was studied for four fundamentally different PEM systems: poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC)/poly(sodium-4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS) (strong/strong), poly(allylamine hydrochloric acid) (PAH)/poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) (weak/weak), and PAH/PSS (weak/strong) and PAH/PSS+PAH/PAA (asymmetric). Slight variations in structure and performance of the PDADMAC/PSS-based membranes were observed. On the contrary, structure and performance of PAH/PAA-based membranes are very susceptible to feed solution pH. A continuous change in charge density with variation in pH significantly affects salt retention. An increased swelling at pH 9 translates to variation in permeability and molecular weight cutoff of the membrane. The susceptibility of PAH/PSS-based membranes to pH is less pronounced compared to the PAH/PAA-based membranes since only one of the polyelectrolytes involved is weak. No structural changes were observed, indicating additional specific interactions between the polyelectrolytes other than electrostatic forces that stabilize film structure. A combination of the PAH/PSS and PAH/PAA system (8 + 2 bilayers) also displays a clear dependency of both membrane structure and performance on solution pH, where PAH/PSS is dominating due to a higher bilayer number.

Identifiers

PMID36660251
PMCPMC9841528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.