Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2022
Mechanical Performance of Lightweight-Designed Honeycomb Structures Fabricated Using Multijet Fusion Additive Manufacturing Technology.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D-Printable, Honeycomb-Inspired Tissue-Like Bioelectrodes for Patient-Specific Neural Interface.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Experimental Study on the Impact Compression Properties of Aluminum Honeycomb with Gradient-Thickness Cell Walls Using a Three-Factor Orthogonal Matrix Design.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Tailorable Energy Absorption During Quasi-Static Crush via Additively Manufactured Honeycomb.Polymers · 2025Article
- Additive Manufacturability and Parametric Studies on an Extended Three-Dimensional Re-Entrant Auxetic Structure with Angled Struts.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- Energy Absorption of 3D Printed ABS and TPU Multimaterial Honeycomb Structures.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- Rising role of 3D-printing in delivery of therapeutics for infectious disease.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular structures including three-dimensional lattices and two-dimensional honeycombs have significant benefits in achieving optimal mechanical performance with light weighting. Recently developed design techniques integrated with additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have enhanced the possibility of fabricating intricate geometries such as honeycomb structures. Generally, failure initiates from the sharp edges in honeycomb structures, which leads to a reduction in stiffness and energy absorption performance. By material quantity, these hinges account for a large amount of material in cells. Therefore, redesigning of honeycomb structures is needed, which can improve aforementioned characteristics. However, this increases the design complexity of honeycombs, such that novel manufacturing techniques such as AM has to be employed. This research attempts to investigate the optimal material distribution of three different topologies of honeycomb structures (hexagonal, triangular, and square) with nine different design configurations. To achieve this, higher amount of material was distributed at nodes in the form of fillets while keeping overall weight of the structure constant. Furthermore, these design configurations were analyzed in terms of stiffness, energy absorption, and the failure behavior by performing finite element analysis and experimental tests on the samples manufactured using Multijet fusion AM technology. It was found that adding material to the edges can improve the mechanical properties of honeycombs such as stiffness and energy absorption efficiency. Furthermore, the failure mechanism is changed due to redistribution of material in the structure. The design configurations without fillets suffer from brittle failure at the start of the plastic deformation, whereas the configurations with increased material proportion at the nodes have larger plastic deformation zones, which improves the energy absorption efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.