Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660217›Full record

ArticleEuropean oral research2022

Periodontal status of mandibular second molar after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars- a prospective clinical trial.

Swathi Singh, Sruthima Naga Venkata Satya Gottumukkala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh Konathala, Gautami Subhadra Penmetsa, Chinnaswami Doraiswami Dwarakanath, Vivek Bypalli

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European oral research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swathi SinghDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra PradeshIndia.
Sruthima Naga Venkata Satya GottumukkalaDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra PradeshIndia.
Santosh Venkata Ramesh KonathalaDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra PradeshIndia.
Gautami Subhadra PenmetsaDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra PradeshIndia.
Chinnaswami Doraiswami DwarakanathDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra PradeshIndia.
Vivek BypalliDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra PradeshIndia.
MNR Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Mandibular third molar (M3) extraction is the common surgical procedures carried out; however, one of the complications is development of periodontal disease in adjacent second molars (M2). Hence the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of extraction of M3 on the periodontal status of M2. Materials and methods: Study included 120 sites with mandibular M2 adjacent to the impacted M3. Plaque index(PI), gingival index(GI), probing pocket depths(PD), clinical attachment levels(CAL), Gingival recession(GR) and alveolar bone height(ABH) before and 9-12 months after surgical extraction of M3 were assessed. Patients perception was assessed using dichotomous rating. Four types of impactions(IMP) were included along with surgical cofactors like degree of impaction, flap design, bone removal, tooth sectioning. Results: At baseline mesioangular and horizontal IMP showed greater PPD and CAL. After extraction of M3 there was significant decrease in PPD & CAL. 14% cases showed significant increase gingival recession at the distobuccal of M2. Although 10.9% of patients had an alveolar bony defect(ABD) distal to the M2, there was considerable improvement in ABH from baseline. The ABDs are mostly associated with mesioangular and horizontal IMP. Conclusion: Extraction of impacted M3 proves to be beneficial on periodontal status of M2. However, occasionally, mesioangular and horizontal IMP are likely to develop ABD distal to M2 and hence can be followed by regenerative procedures to prevent the formation of ABD.

Indexed as

Alveolar bone defectimpacted toothmandibular second molarmandibular third molartooth extraction

Identifiers

PMID36660217
PMCPMC9826707
OpenAlexW4298001479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.